The figures for imprisonment in five countries between 1930 and 1980
The bar chart given bellow illustrate the personage for imprisonment in five states between 1930 and 1980. It can be seen that each country had a fluctuation amount of figure for imprisonment in the first years and the lowest was great britain. In the last decade united states and great britain saw a significant increase.
From 1930, in the first decade great britain had similarity amount of figures for imprisonment then increased continually of 55 figures from 30 to 85 between 1930 and 1980. While the personage for imprisonment in australia be violated during five decades. In 1970 both had equal number of figures around 65
In the five decade for three states other. New Zealand decreased enormously for two decades (between 1930 to 1950) from 100 to 55 in the first and 55 to 47 in second decade. After that was same of amount figures and rose minimally from 65 to 86 between 1970 and 1980. Whereas United states had dramatic fluctuate in every decades but at the end of the decade grew considerably from 95 to 238 between 1970 and 1980. Total of figures for imprisonment who oscillate was almost the same in Canada, there was a minimal declined of 5 figures from 120 to 115 in first decades then climbed minimally of 1 figures between 1940 and 19 But dipped in next decades and climbed moderately from 82 to 87 at last decade
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-23 | poca | view | |
| 2023-06-18 | ThHuong | 78 | view |
| 2023-05-28 | vuhungbo | 78 | view |
| 2023-04-01 | honganhn459@gmail.com | 67 | view |
| 2023-02-12 | phuongnguyen1234 | 67 | view |
- Some people think that museums should be enjoyable place to entertain people, while othere believe that the purpose of museums is to educate 73
- What those kids are doing 89
- Online sales for retail sectors in Canada 56
- The sales made by a coffee shop in an office building on a typical weekday 56
- Global sales of games software, CDs and DVD or Video 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, second, so, then, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 33.7804878049 142% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1105.0 965.302439024 114% => OK
No of words: 236.0 196.424390244 120% => OK
Chars per words: 4.68220338983 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91947592106 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56591851103 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.478813559322 0.547539520022 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 328.5 283.868780488 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.2270208604 43.030603864 138% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.5 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.8 5.23603664747 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.444563410504 0.215688989381 206% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.195967298524 0.103423049105 189% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.119059486473 0.0843802449381 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.362693174434 0.15604864568 232% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.062948126408 0.0819641961636 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.16 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.52 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.