Average CO2 Emissions per person in the Uk, sweden, italy and portugal between 1967 and 2007
The line graph given bellow illustrate average CO2 emissions each people in the Sweden, Italy and portugal between 1967 and 2007. It can be seen that average CO2 emissions fluctuate during four decade in four states. The biggest average CO2 emissions occurred in UK. In contrast Sweden and Portugal had the smallest raise.
Average CO2 emissions each people in UK registered gradual decrease in four decade. But at the first year average CO2 emission in that country was higher than three other states. The second state which had big amount average CO2 emissions at the beginning decade is Sweden, had an enormous growth of 2 between 1967 and 1977 then declined significantly till last decade
Two countries other, Italy and Sweden saw a considerable growth over the period. Throughout the decade average CO2 emission in Italy was bigger than Portugal. There was a considerable increase of 3.5 in average CO2 emission per person in Italy from 4 to 7.5 between 1967 and 1997 . and maintain the same level at 7.5 in last periods. While, average CO2 emissions each people in Portugal in first decade was smaller than Italy. Afterwards climbed slightly in next three decades
- The figures for imprisonment in five countries between 1930 and 1980 61
- The sales made by a coffee shop in an office building on a typical weekday 56
- Currentl there is a trend towards the use of alternative forms of medicine. However at best these methods are ineffective and at worst the may be dangerous. To what extent do you agree with this statement 56
- The GDP growth per year for three countries between 2007 and 2010 78
- Information about rail transport in four countries in 2017 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 195, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'decade' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'decades'.
Suggestion: decades
...age CO2 emissions fluctuate during four decade in four states. The biggest average CO2...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 271, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: contrast,
...verage CO2 emissions occurred in UK. In contrast Sweden and Portugal had the smallest ra...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 77, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'decade' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'decades'.
Suggestion: decades
... UK registered gradual decrease in four decade. But at the first year average CO2 emis...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 211, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'amounted'.
Suggestion: amounted
... states. The second state which had big amount average CO2 emissions at the beginning ...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 280, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...taly from 4 to 7.5 between 1967 and 1997 . and maintain the same level at 7.5 in l...
^^
Line 5, column 283, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: And
...y from 4 to 7.5 between 1967 and 1997 . and maintain the same level at 7.5 in last ...
^^^
Line 5, column 335, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... the same level at 7.5 in last periods. While, average CO2 emissions each people in P...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, second, so, then, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 981.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 195.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03076923077 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73687570622 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46273242972 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.538461538462 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 304.2 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 59.0639954249 43.030603864 137% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.75 112.824112599 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.25 22.9334400587 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.33333333333 5.23603664747 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 7.0 1.69756097561 412% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.09268292683 244% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.538400774122 0.215688989381 250% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.211701101686 0.103423049105 205% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.148423234504 0.0843802449381 176% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.399817084107 0.15604864568 256% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0907185964418 0.0819641961636 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 61.2550243902 90% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.83 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 11.4329268293 52% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.