The figures bolow compare the number of internet users in several European nation as well as the prevalence of online shopping in these countries.
The figures given compare some distinct countries in Europe in terms of the quantity of Internet users and how local inhabitants prefered to do shopping online.
It is evident from the table that during the research period, the UK was by far the country having the highest number of Internet users. Additionally, the pie chart indicates that French residents were more fond of doing shopping via the Internet.
Regarding the table, in 1995, there were 16 million UK’s people utilising the Internet, which outnumbered the figure for Germany by two to one, at 5 million individuals .At the same time, the quantities of France and Switzerland were dwarfed by that of Germany, at 2 and 1 respectively, compared to only 0.5 million Spain’s inhabitants accessing to the Internet. By 2004, UK’s citizens were more inclined to use this invention, with 41 million people, whereas after having upsurged to 314 in 2000, the number of Germany dropped tremendously to 15 in 2004. Likewise, a minimal growth was recorded in the figure for France to 6 million, accompanied by roughly similar trends witnessed in those of Switzerland and Spain to 4 and 2 million people in turn.
In terms of the table, in 2004, the share of French resident interested in shopping online accounted for the highest proportion of the table, which was double that of Switzerland and triple that of Germany. By contrast, individuals settling down in other countries were less indulged in this type of sh
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 206, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ndicates that French residents were more fond of doing shopping via the Internet....
^^
Line 3, column 169, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... by two to one, at 5 million individuals .At the same time, the quantities of Fran...
^^
Line 3, column 170, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: At
...y two to one, at 5 million individuals .At the same time, the quantities of France...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
likewise, regarding, so, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 33.7804878049 151% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1232.0 965.302439024 128% => OK
No of words: 246.0 196.424390244 125% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0081300813 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96035189615 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78341024567 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 106.607317073 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569105691057 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 369.0 283.868780488 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 3.36585365854 297% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 30.0 22.4926829268 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 79.0165133058 43.030603864 184% => OK
Chars per sentence: 154.0 112.824112599 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.75 22.9334400587 134% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.176327328283 0.215688989381 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0807384974716 0.103423049105 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0612162741481 0.0843802449381 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126361677287 0.15604864568 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.06312044222 0.0819641961636 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 13.2329268293 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.49 61.2550243902 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.3012195122 134% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.37 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.91 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 40.7170731707 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.9970731707 127% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.