The graph below gives information about car ownership in Britain from 1971 to 2007
The line chart illustrates the changes in car ownership in Britain between 1971 and 2007
Overall, the proportion of households using car increased over the period shown. Interestingly, despite the opposite trends of others, one car owners’ rate seemed to remain unchanged in almost time of over three decades surveyed.
In the year 1971, there was nearly a half of British households having no regular use of car. The figure for one-car ownership was somewhere slightly lower, at about 45%. In that year, it was uncommon for people to own two car or more with around 8% and just approximately 1% of households falling into two types of these categories, respectively.
Over the period of 36 years, there was a dramatic decrease in the proportion of no car families to end the period at around 25%. In contrast, two cars users experienced an opposite trend to increase continuously, reaching around 27% of population in the year 2007. Britain seemed to remain the percentage of one car users in this period as the same as the beginning year, but three or more cars ownership was many time multiple its’ figure to nearly 8% in the ending year.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-13 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-10-13 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-21 | fdsugb22 | view | |
| 2023-06-14 | hieu13092006 | view | |
| 2022-10-12 | DOT BABA | 78 | view |
- The widespead use of the Internet gives people more freedom at home instead of going to work or college. Do you think its advantegeous outweigh the disadvantegeous? 89
- Some people think that people who chose a job early and keep doing it are more likely to have a satisfying career life than those who frequently change jobs.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 89
- The graph below gives information about car ownership in Britain from 1971 to 2007 61
- Fossil fuels (Coal, oil and natural gas) are the main source in many countries. However, in some countries, the use of alternative sources of energy (wind or solar energy) are encouraged. Do you think that it is positive or negative development? 78
- Some people think that a huge amount of time and money is spent on the protection of wild animals, and that this money could be better spent on the human population. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 84, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ar ownership in Britain between 1971 and 2007 Overall, the proportion of house...
^^
Line 7, column 473, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...' figure to nearly 8% in the ending year.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, so, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 968.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 196.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9387755102 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74165738677 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7798023535 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.571428571429 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 297.0 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.2283598426 43.030603864 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.0 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.5 5.23603664747 48% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.205929721215 0.215688989381 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101927079881 0.103423049105 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0699983314828 0.0843802449381 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158929168468 0.15604864568 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0955259822305 0.0819641961636 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.