Fossil fuels such as coal, oil and natural gas, are used in many countries. The use of alternative sources of energy, including wind and solar power, is encouraged. Is this trend a positive or negative development?
The demanding for using energy is incresing globally as well as the strains on existing limited resources like coal or gas also rise. some developing countries have started to offer more incentives to the civilians to use alternative source of energy instead. this is actually a postive trend as the following reasons.
It is universally acknowleged that the alternative resources are green energy, which is totally friendly to the environment. In recent decades, the humankind has addressed one of the most critical issue, which is environmental issue. The negative impacts on the environment such as pollution or deforestation as a direct result of human activities has also brought us some difficulties in daily life. By using the green energy, the rate of pollution may be declined. this is one good signal for the environment in the furture if the use of alternative resource is encouraged widely.
Another fact is that these green energy are unlimited resources. Dissimilar to fossil fuels, such as coal, gas, oil, the alternative sources of energy is not limit. Anyone can exploit and utilise the alternative resources by making the wind turbines for the use of wind energy or using solar panel to absorb the solar enegry. The water energy is also been utilised by some countries to produce electricity with the hydroelectric power plant. As the result, the green energy should be use wordwide as its convienient and flexibility.
To conclude, making use of the alternative sources of energy is a postive development for the global and the environments. It is a feasible resources that can replace the fossil fuels, and should be promoted.
- Multicultural societies, in which there is a mixture of different ethnic peoples, bring more benefits than drawbacks to a country.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 11
- The three pie charts below show the change in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981 1991 and 2001 67
- Modern buildings change the character and appearance of towns and cities. The government should insist that new buildings be built in traditional styles to protect cultural identity.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
- The graphs below show the annual expenditure of university students in three countries in 2003 47
- The three pie charts below show the change in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981 1991 and 2001 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 135, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Some
...d resources like coal or gas also rise. some developing countries have started to of...
^^^^
Line 1, column 261, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...e alternative source of energy instead. this is actually a postive trend as the foll...
^^^^
Line 2, column 467, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
... the rate of pollution may be declined. this is one good signal for the environment ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 484, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'used'?
Suggestion: used
... the result, the green energy should be use wordwide as its convienient and flexibi...
^^^
Line 4, column 140, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'resource'?
Suggestion: resource
... and the environments. It is a feasible resources that can replace the fossil fuels, and ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, if, may, so, well, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1381.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 269.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13382899628 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95105946264 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 176.041082164 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.524163568773 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 464.4 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.3534687076 49.4020404114 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.0666666667 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9333333333 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.6 7.06120827912 51% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.307432207288 0.244688304435 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101516292951 0.084324248473 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0769667004883 0.0667982634062 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.186741974497 0.151304729494 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.041205962396 0.056905535591 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.76 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.