Some employers for their employees subsidized membership of gyms and sports clubs,
believing that this will make their staff healthier and thus more effective at work. Other employers see no benefit in doing so. Consider the arguments from both aspects of this possible debate, and reach a conclusion.
Fitness and health awareness camps are common in organizations to keep their staff fit and active while working, which helps the organization to achieve higher targets are thought by some employers. However, others do not agree and believe there are no fruitful results by the aforesaid idea. Before reaching a conclusion, it is important to discuss both aspects of this argument.
On the one side, knowledge of good diet and exercise in daily routine helps the person to remain fit while working in an organization. Especially workers are requested to more breaks of short intervals while performing repetitive tasks, which benefits them to remain active and stable while working for long hours. Hence, some organization has gyms and refreshing units inside the accommodation and corporate offices.
Conversely, fitness activities take the time of an individual and some employers feel that these are unnecessary activities that only increase the number of tasks for the organization instead of making it better financially. Therefore such companies preferred to provide financial support to their employees like bonuses and financial rewards rather than providing gym or sports memberships. In addition to that, management finds it difficult to calculate the profits from the health fitness camps.
To conclude, although, the precise computation is difficult to know the exact output from the employees, fitter and active workers always beneficial for the organization. Therefore, I believe that this culture should be encouraged in organizations to minimize the chance of errors from staff. It is irrefutable the experts will find the solution of computation as well in the future.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-12 | preet kaur | 78 | view |
| 2019-07-03 | bhatvishal@ | 61 | view |
| 2019-07-02 | bhatvishal@ | 61 | view |
| 2019-07-02 | bhatvishal@ | 61 | view |
| 2019-04-24 | sai girish | 78 | view |
- It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environment, suchas the South Pole. Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages? 61
- A friend who lives in another country has invited you to come and stay with him or her on your next holiday. You are too busy to accept the invitation.Write a letter to your friend. In your letter,Thank him/her for the invitation.Explain why cannot come.A 56
- Some people believe that the best way to spend a holiday in a foreign country is to go out to meet people instead of staying in the hotel most of the time. what is your opinion? give reasons and include relevant examples from your own experience. 56
- Scientists agree that people ruin their health by eating junk food Some people think that the best way to prevent people from eating junk food is to educate them while others believe that this won t work Discuss both views and give your own opinion 90
- Many people are working at home rather than in the workplace. Some people believe this will bring benefits to the workers and their families, but others suggest it will cause stress in the home. Discuss both sides and give your opinion. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 226, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...nstead of making it better financially. Therefore such companies preferred to provide fin...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, hence, however, if, so, therefore, well, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1430.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 260.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.5 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9383105076 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.638461538462 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 450.9 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.7434042315 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.166666667 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6666666667 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.91666666667 7.06120827912 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.229978964635 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0705283317376 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0349315878719 0.0667982634062 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121645152789 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0352471998504 0.056905535591 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.62 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.6 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.