The pie charts below show electricity generation by source in New Zealand
and Germany in 1980 and 2010.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features,
and make comparisons where relevant.
The pie graphs compare electricity production by five different fuels in New Zealand and Germany between 1980 and 2010.
Overall, while the electricity, in Germany, is mainly generated by nuclear power, the most popular source was coal in New Zealand. Besides, the total unit's creation increased in both countries throughout 30 years.
In New Zealand, the total number rose quickly from 127 units (1980) to 200 units (2010). During this time, the figure for coal dramatically increased from 56 to 150 units, which accounted for the three-fourths of electricity creation. While the number of hydro stayed the same proportion (nearly 25%), the figure for natural gas and petroleum dropped rapidly from 30 units and 11 units (1980) to 2 units (2010), respectively.
In Germany, the number of nuclear, which did not have in New Zealand, grew significantly from 20 units (1980) to 155 units (2010). The numbers of coal, petroleum, natural gas, hydro decreased from 28,22,28 and 7 units (1980) to a combined figure which was less than nearly three times the figure of nuclear (2010). Besides, the total number climbed double to 214 units (2010).
- The charts below show percentage of water used by different sectors in Sydney, in 1997 and 2007.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and making comparisons where relevant. 56
- The pie charts below show electricity generation by source in New Zealandand Germany in 1980 and 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features,and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology.Discuss both these views a 56
- The consumption of the world's resources (oil, and water etc.) is increasing at a dangerous rate. What are causes and solutions? 73
- The diagrams below show how houses can be protected in areas which are prone to flooding 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 151, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'units'' or 'unit's'?
Suggestion: units'; unit's
...coal in New Zealand. Besides, the total units creation increased in both countries th...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 943.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 186.0 196.424390244 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06989247312 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69299088775 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58510479359 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.559139784946 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 261.0 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.33902439024 207% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.4322325886 43.030603864 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.777777778 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6666666667 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.44444444444 5.23603664747 47% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.132537763338 0.215688989381 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0708033979226 0.103423049105 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0586511229949 0.0843802449381 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10983222578 0.15604864568 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0551697422727 0.0819641961636 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.