People can perform everyday tasks, such as shopping and banking as well as business transactions, without meeting other people face-to-face because of technology.
What are the effects of this on individual and society as a whole?
Recently, impact of technology in people's daily tasks such as shopping, banking as well as business transactions has sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question "what are the effects of not face to face communication on individuals and society?" Whereas it is a widely held view that it is not beneficial, I will discuss controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From the social standpoint, face to face communication are bound up inextricably with cash transactions, which indicates they lead to both more paper and more cutting trees. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists in 2018 demonstrates the relationship between online shopping and preserving tress as well as an exponential increase in cardless transactions. Their academic criticism was impressive. Consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus far supports the contention that the likelihood of banking system is correlated positively with not only bank card but also bussinuss owners.
Within the realm of international trade, without the slightest doubt, technology advancement attribute to less traffic, in that it would come down to less weather pollution, time saving, and black marketer. A salient example of such attribution is local bazaar, which is a cause for concern since it was mistaken to take daily tasks for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars might have had the opportunity to pinpoint modern society problems. Likewise, hardly had they confined their attention to making money, pay check, and even bank account. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the pivotal role of face to face communicationnication in individuals.
To conclude, as for myself, as the saying goes "all's well that ends well," after analyzing what elaborated above, I firmly believe that not face to face communication has not negative impacts on individuals and society. However, with the benefit of hindsight, we conceive the more we research, the further we discover.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-18 | manraj123 | 80 | view |
| 2019-07-19 | yasamin.gharib62 | 85 | view |
| 2019-07-05 | yasamin.gharib62 | 88 | view |
| 2019-07-05 | yasamin.gharib62 | 88 | view |
| 2018-04-09 | epouei | 85 | view |
- Successful sports stars and glamorous film stars are a role model for youngsters. Do you support it or not? (Agree/Disagree). 88
- “Euthanasia is no longer acceptable in the modern society”. Discuss the solutions to accept this fact. 80
- Some people prefer to play team sports, while other prefer to play individual sports. Discuss the advantages of each. Then indicate which you prefer and why? 85
- The traditional subjects are soon moving off in last year's. Kindly provide the solutions and ideas to save such objects. 11
- Do you think student who go to the universities should pay full fee than who do not go to universities 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 78, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
...ying goes 'alls well that ends well,' after analyzing what elaborated above,...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, however, if, likewise, so, thus, well, whereas, as for, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 20.9802955665 110% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 31.9359605911 132% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.75862068966 191% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1741.0 1207.87684729 144% => OK
No of words: 314.0 242.827586207 129% => OK
Chars per words: 5.54458598726 5.00649968141 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 3.92707691288 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.27141998676 2.71678728327 120% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 139.433497537 146% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.649681528662 0.580463131201 112% => OK
syllable_count: 536.4 379.143842365 141% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.5024630542 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 92.231705503 50.4703680194 183% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.083333333 104.977214359 138% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1666666667 20.9669160288 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.91666666667 7.25397266985 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.265510312197 0.242375264174 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0726601269373 0.0925447433944 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0768297193614 0.071462118173 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151175183115 0.151781067708 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.069083421695 0.0609392437508 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.7 12.6369458128 140% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 53.1260098522 69% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.15 11.5310837438 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.46 8.32886699507 126% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 55.0591133005 200% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 21.0 9.94827586207 211% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.3980295567 119% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.