University students always focus on one specialist subject, but some people think universities should encourage their students to study a range of subjects in addition to their own subject. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
So important learning many knowledge and proficiency has become that it would be beneficial in this globalization era which demands student higher education level have to learn considerable subjects instead of one subject. I personally agree with this statement to some extent and I will explain why in this essay.
Perhaps, the major reason for this would be the advancement of technology which has changed some of role of workers. By this I mean that if someone have no plenty of particular skills, the artificial intelligent would change job which is generally taken by human. For example, many journalist jobs has been altered by computer such as collecting and analyzing data. Thus, department of journalism major should encourage the students to attend other subjects which support they after graduating regarding creativity, big data, and state-of-the-art-device. Furthermore, taking huge range of many subjects would enhance students to learn conveniently. Broadly, a lot of number of high school graduates receive constrained information related to their taken subjects in the university. As a result, enabling the chance to learn particular things which they interested in would encourage their abilities. It might lead to emerging the number of new generation working with passion through which the productivity might increase gradually is inevitable.
I do appreciate that some people think differently, saying that it is better to allow taking merely one subject because the students have to focus on. Nevertheless, in this global circumstance, huge range of abilities is required to face fast-moving challenge. Of course, they could remain potentially focus on their pleasurable subjects.
To conclude, for universities, it would be necessary to rethink whether or not allowing students solely take one subject is still required. It appears to me that learning several subjects which involving passion and knowledge of technology would be better solution as the world are facing the new digital era.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-02-18 | Trinh Phuong | 73 | view |
| 2020-06-14 | Nodirjon | 78 | view |
| 2019-07-09 | mrizkil | 89 | view |
| 2019-06-26 | AigerimSakenova | 56 | view |
| 2019-04-07 | zh.shuvo | 73 | view |
- University students always focus on one specialist subject, but some people think universities should encourage their students to study a range of subjects in addition to their own subject. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 89
- Some people think they have right to use as much freshwater as they want. Others believe governments should tightly control the use of fresh water as it is limited resource. Discuss both views and give your option. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 23, Rule ID: MANY_FEW_UNCOUNTABLE[2]
Message: Use 'much' or 'little' with uncountable nouns.
Suggestion: much; little
So important learning many knowledge and proficiency has become th...
^^^^
Line 1, column 23, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[2]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun knowledge seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much knowledge', 'a good deal of knowledge'.
Suggestion: much knowledge; a good deal of knowledge
So important learning many knowledge and proficiency has become that it woul...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 149, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'someone' must be used with a third-person verb: 'has'.
Suggestion: has
...workers. By this I mean that if someone have no plenty of particular skills, the art...
^^^^
Line 7, column 65, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
...ities, it would be necessary to rethink whether or not allowing students solely take one subje...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, nevertheless, regarding, so, still, thus, for example, i mean, of course, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1715.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 310.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.53225806452 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13433039981 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.596774193548 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 530.1 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.904206744 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.333333333 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6666666667 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.4 7.06120827912 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.261726147181 0.244688304435 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0882325461532 0.084324248473 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0744026277303 0.0667982634062 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172101826864 0.151304729494 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0430950660958 0.056905535591 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.79 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.31 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.