"Unlike great thinkers and great artists, the most effective political leaders must often yield to public opinion and abandon principle for the sake of compromise."
In this modern era, great thinkers, artists and politicians all are prominent influential personalities. People tend to look up to them. Hence, they all have a crucial role to play. In accordance to the author, thinkers and artists never tend to comprise with their beliefs and this unique ability makes them discrete from other contemporaries. However, politicians have a different scenario, they have to be heedful, consider all the perspectives and choose the most beneficial option. Although, i don't recommend to comprise with their principles since, people have admired and trusted him for his principles.
First and foremost, politician should never abandon his principles for his benefit. There are many politicians who believed in their morals and stood by it irrespective of their ramifications. However, it may seem easy but, it takes lot of perseverance and lots of sacrifices are to be given. For instance, Gandhi was known for nonviolence and peace. When India was in severe pain and agony. There was situation where many other famous leaders have tried to convince him to abandon his principles and opt for nonviolence, free India as soon as possible. However, Gandhi had different plans, he was adherent to his principles and believed that every citizen should follow peace and nonviolence. Now, India is known for peace.
Secondly, politicians are discrete from artists and thinkers. Since, at times artist tries to be selfish and puts his opinion and principles in front of everything irrespective of whether it harms other feelings. However, politician has to be selfless and shrewd at the same time. To cite an example, Artist at times had choose to make plot of their movie on the sensitive issues which could hurt millions of feelings, just to lure the attention of public and to get as much as money as possible.
Lastly, when a adverse situation politician has numerous suggestion to choose from. Nevertheless, best politician is person ignores his personal interest and selects option that is beneficial for all the citizens. For example, when there was a vacant place in our town council, the leader had to choose between his relative and Rahul who was liked by everyone and was known for his judiciousness. However, the leader chooses Rahul for this place and told he deserved to be in town council.
To sum up, author's opinion about politicians is partially true. Although, he did not give enough evidence for his last premise that politician has to abandon his principles for the sake of compromise. Artists and thinkers give preference to their priorities and personal interest. However, politician has to be impassive and opt something which is benevolent for everyone. Politicians should adhere to their principles and morals, how difficult and tempting the situation may be.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-21 | liakath96 | 50 | view |
| 2016-11-28 | zeus_helene_leda | 50 | view |
| 2016-07-18 | ravitejathoram | 50 | view |
| 2016-07-18 | ravitejathoram | 54 | view |
- The following is taken from a memo from the advertising director of the Super Screen Movie Production Company."According to a recent report from our marketing department, during the past year, fewer people attended Super Screen-produced movies than i 45
- Those who treat politics and morality as though they were separate realms fail to understand either the one or the other 54
- The following is a memorandum from the business manager of a television station.“Over the past year, our late-night news program has devoted increased time to national news and less time to weather and local news. During this time period, most of the co 55
- "The purpose of education should be to create an academic environment that is separate from the outside world. This kind of environment is ideal because it allows students to focus on important ideas without being held back by practical concerns. 50
- It is dangerous to trust only intelligence. 16
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 500, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...the most beneficial option. Although, i dont recommend to comprise with their princi...
^^^^
Line 1, column 505, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'recommend comprising'.
Suggestion: recommend comprising
...ost beneficial option. Although, i dont recommend to comprise with their principles since, people hav...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 322, Rule ID: HAD_VBP[1]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'chosen'.
Suggestion: chosen
...To cite an example, Artist at times had choose to make plot of their movie on the sens...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 322, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'chosen'.
Suggestion: chosen
...To cite an example, Artist at times had choose to make plot of their movie on the sens...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 14, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...h as money as possible. Lastly, when a adverse situation politician has numero...
^
Line 7, column 97, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: ', the best'.
Suggestion: , the best
... suggestion to choose from. Nevertheless, best politician is person ignores his person...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 491, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...told he deserved to be in town council. To sum up, authors opinion about politic...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, however, if, lastly, look, may, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, as to, for example, for instance, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.5258426966 118% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 28.0 14.8657303371 188% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 33.0505617978 118% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 58.6224719101 96% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2370.0 2235.4752809 106% => OK
No of words: 455.0 442.535393258 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20879120879 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61852021839 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84905533297 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 227.0 215.323595506 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.498901098901 0.4932671777 101% => OK
syllable_count: 738.9 704.065955056 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.2370786517 133% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.8148734177 60.3974514979 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.7777777778 118.986275619 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8518518519 23.4991977007 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.81481481481 5.21951772744 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 10.2758426966 156% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.131122538325 0.243740707755 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0371861948844 0.0831039109588 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0364373159196 0.0758088955206 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0764111424042 0.150359130593 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0314738313783 0.0667264976115 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 14.1392134831 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 48.8420337079 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.64 12.1639044944 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 100.480337079 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.