It goes without saying that, we as Homo sapiens, live in an age when our lifestyle has undergone profound changes and became more sophisticated. By this definition the swift and monumental scientific and technological achievements caused that pinpoint the industrial revolution as a milestone. Therefore, this question arises whether is there any similarity between the era before and after this turning point or not to use available experiences for building better tomorrow. The following essay takes an elaborating look at this statement to yield an ultimate and rational conclusion.
There is no denying that the past has something to teach us, but the main question is that do them works us. Admittedly, in the field of political history, the study of past occurrences can be helpful. Without doubt, by reviewing a country's background including battles, colonization, goods monopoly, custom, culture, tradition, geographical and geo-political conditions its weaknesses and strengths can be comprehensible. For instance, suppose Iran as a model of study, by looking past we can realize that this country was faced several severe droughts and famine so people dug Qanat to overcome this problem. This says that governments should pay special attention to this issue by allocating budget for improving irrigation systems. Another point is that just suppose Maragheh observatory, it was established 700 years ago at the Moghool monarchy. By delving into it, we can figure out why this site was chosen for astronomical masses observation.
In addition, each of the scientists discovered a part of science and delivered to the next generation. This gradual transmission of findings can be account as learning from the past. Indisputably, the past is not efficient in every context to the same extent. In this regard, a group of sociologists and historians At ANU University carried out an investigation to the effect of the past on eliminating our present problems. Finally, they announced that in about 91% of occasions the past experience was the key to problems.
To wrap it up, according to the aforementioned materials we can reach a conclusive conclusion that, if we consider one minute ago as a past, in that case, we can easily claim that our present civilization is owe to the past lessons. As a matter of fact, believe it or not, accept it or reject, the things are turning around which indicates past fosters us to be strong and equipped for drafting future.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Most businesspeople are motivated only by the desire for more money 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following the statement?Being creative rather than planning carefully, helps people come up with the best solution a problem. 90
- A job with more vacation time but a low salary is better than a job with a high salary but less vacation time. 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Telephone has greater influence on people’s lives than television has. 90
- Do you aree or disagree with the following statement?Students should not take part time job while they are studying in universities 90
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 486, Rule ID: PAST_EXPERIENCE_MEMORY[1]
Message: Use simply 'experience'.
Suggestion: experience
...nced that in about 91% of occasions the past experience was the key to problems. To wrap i...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t experience was the key to problems. To wrap it up, according to the aforemen...
^^^
Line 5, column 209, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'owed'.
Suggestion: owed
... claim that our present civilization is owe to the past lessons. As a matter of fac...
^^^
Line 5, column 404, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...trong and equipped for drafting future.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, if, look, so, therefore, for instance, in addition, as a matter of fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 43.0788530466 100% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 52.1666666667 117% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.0752688172 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2077.0 1977.66487455 105% => OK
No of words: 398.0 407.700716846 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21859296482 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46653527281 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08835672714 2.67179642975 116% => OK
Unique words: 248.0 212.727598566 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.623115577889 0.524837075471 119% => OK
syllable_count: 650.7 618.680645161 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.94265232975 223% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.8251171087 48.9658058833 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.388888889 100.406767564 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1111111111 20.6045352989 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.72222222222 5.45110844103 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.107856754302 0.236089414692 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0335647193862 0.076458572812 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0350548166087 0.0737576698707 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0718496597136 0.150856017488 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0488949459029 0.0645574589148 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 11.7677419355 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 10.9000537634 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.69 8.01818996416 121% => OK
difficult_words: 125.0 86.8835125448 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.