Whether design of building will have a positive or negative impact on people's life and work?
Recently, the effects of building design in people's life has sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question "what are the impacts of building design on people's life and work?". Whereas it is a widely held view that design of building has negative impacts on people's life, I will discuss controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From the psychology standpoint, building architecture is bound up inextricably with indivisual's mind, which indicates it leads both positive and negative impacts on life. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists in 2019 demonstrates the relationship between building materials and art works as well as an exponential increase in creativity ability of indivisuals. Their academic criticism was impressive. Consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus far supports the contention that the likelihood of traditional architecture is correlated positively with not only cultural values but also life style.
Within the realm of building industry, without the slightest doubt, work enviornment attribute to warm enviornment, in that it would come down to higher performance, good human behaviors, and cerativity inspiration. A salient example of such attribution is dark building, which is a cause for concern since it was mistaken to take stressful conditions for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars might have had the opportunity to pinpoint design of building problems. Likewise, hardly had they confined their attention to a valuable painting, momumental sculpture, and even high ceiling. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the pivotal role of architectures.
To conclude, as for myself, as the saying goes "all's well that ends well," after analyzing what elaborated above, I firmly believe that building design has both positive and negative impacts on human life and work. However, with the benefit of hindsight, we conceive the more we research, the further we discover.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | manraj123 | 77 | view |
| 2020-01-24 | yasamin.gharib62 | 77 | view |
| 2019-10-10 | Jaskaransingh11 | 77 | view |
| 2019-10-09 | Daniel Torres | 80 | view |
| 2019-10-08 | jeeva | 77 | view |
- What is the best invention of last 100 years, the computer, antibiotics, the airplane, and explain why? 85
- The belching and unauthorized behavior is unacceptable in modern offices. How far you support this view? Give your response with justification. 88
- building more roads to allow more vehicle owner to improve the networks of public transport? agree or disagree? 11
- Do you think students who go to university should pay full fee than who do not go to university given that graduates earn higher salaries. Agree or disagree 11
- Problems and benefits for high school students study plays and works of theatres written centuries ago. Discuss and use your own experience. 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 459, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...iticism was impressive. Consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus far su...
^^
Line 7, column 78, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
...ying goes 'alls well that ends well,' after analyzing what elaborated above,...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, however, if, likewise, so, thus, well, whereas, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 20.9802955665 105% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 31.9359605911 128% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1730.0 1207.87684729 143% => OK
No of words: 305.0 242.827586207 126% => OK
Chars per words: 5.67213114754 5.00649968141 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15157528341 2.71678728327 116% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 139.433497537 140% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.639344262295 0.580463131201 110% => OK
syllable_count: 531.9 379.143842365 140% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.8043160066 50.4703680194 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.076923077 104.977214359 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4615384615 20.9669160288 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.53846153846 7.25397266985 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.386840523118 0.242375264174 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109080841877 0.0925447433944 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.120529610227 0.071462118173 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.221099115609 0.151781067708 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.131082010969 0.0609392437508 215% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 12.6369458128 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 53.1260098522 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.9458128079 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.9 11.5310837438 138% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.37 8.32886699507 125% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 55.0591133005 196% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.