Is there any value in studying academic subjects that are not useful in terms of generating wealth for the country?
There is a controversial issue about the importance of teaching academic subjects. Some teachers say that they are significant to study as much as maths and physics, while painters believe that they are waste of time and effort. In this essay, I will consider both points of view and agree with the idea of great importance of art in producing income.
Let us start with the reasons why some teachers in art state that learning academic courses is beneficial for the economy. The first reason is that art normally contributes to the development of tourism. Most tourists readily spend much money in countries, where they can enjoy local culture, so students should learn art subjects to keep their country appealing to visitors. Another reason is that physical education keeps the majority of workforce healthy. Subjects, which train people to stay physically active, often spare a great deal of health expenditure for the country, because people both address to hospital rarely and become more productive at work.
However, some painters claim that completing many academic disciplines bring little profit to artists and governments. They justify their opinion with the following arguments. Firstly, unemployment rate among people with academic degrees is on the rise. More artists cannot find employment in art-related fields after graduation, because many employers are oriented on hiring people majored in engineering as well as business. Secondly, many art amenities are financially inefficient. Today, people usually show little interest in art, because they work hard and find rest in gadgets. As a result, many theaters, museums and galleries not only generate little income to the government, but also they often need extra funding.
In conclusion, even though some painters argue that studying academic subjects creates little benefit to both the country and individuals, I think that people should also graduate in them, because them indirectly bring considerable value to all.
- Nowadays many parents believe that children’s usage of tablets or computers would be good for their future academic career. What are the advantages and disadvantages of such belief? 89
- In western countries there is an increasing number of couples choosing to have no children.What are the advantages and disadvantages to couples having no children? 61
- Scientists believe that computers will become more intelligent than human beings Some people find it a positive development while others think it is negative development Discuss both points and give your own opinion 71
- In many countries, very few people read newspapers or follow the news on TV.What do you think are the causes of this?What solutions can you suggest? 78
- Most artists earn low salaries and therefore should receive findings from the government in order for them to continue with their work.To what extent do you agree? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 319, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to art', 'to be'
Suggestion: to art; to be
...local culture, so students should learn art subjects to keep their country appealin...
^^^
Line 7, column 102, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...academic subjects creates little benefit to both the country and individuals, I t...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, well, while, i think, in conclusion, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1687.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 311.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.42443729904 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69553504177 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.620578778135 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 519.3 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 2.10420841683 333% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.2149628339 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.4375 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4375 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.625 7.06120827912 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.129080875601 0.244688304435 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0362603025904 0.084324248473 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.04325191569 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0853967598306 0.151304729494 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0487374015842 0.056905535591 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.1 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.