With the development of technology and science, some people believe that there is no great value of artists such as musicians and painters. What are the things artists can do but the scientist cannot? Why should we encourage the art area?

Recently, the phenomenon of science and technology development and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the works by artists are not high in a great value, such an issue is regarded as thoroughly constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that scientists are not able to understand the importance of the things that artists do, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
To begin with, there are various reasons that scientists cannot believe the value of art. At first, scientists use objective topics to do their works and studies. However, artists use subjective to do their works. For example, the artist a painter uses a subject related to nature such as landscape or a closed view to draw a painting.
In addition, scientists discover new sciences by studying objects such as plants and chemical materials to treat diseases. But, the artists treat ill people by peace and making calmness for them. For instance, a recent scientific research undertaken by a reputable university has shown that a significant number of illnesses rooted in emotional conditions which could be improved by the works of artists such as light music or a happy movie.
In conclusion, while there are several compelling arguments on this statement, I profoundly believe that the benefits of encouraging artists to do more arts far outweighed its drawbacks.

Votes
Average: 7.7 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Recently, the phenomenon of science and ...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ll analyze that throughout this essay. To begin with, there are various reasons...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e or a closed view to draw a painting. In addition, scientists discover new sci...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... such as light music or a happy movie. In conclusion, while there are several c...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, so, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.5418719212 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 31.9359605911 97% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1210.0 1207.87684729 100% => OK
No of words: 234.0 242.827586207 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17094017094 5.00649968141 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91114542567 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9591664259 2.71678728327 109% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 139.433497537 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615384615385 0.580463131201 106% => OK
syllable_count: 372.6 379.143842365 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.0296428648 50.4703680194 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.0 104.977214359 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2727272727 20.9669160288 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.2727272727 7.25397266985 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.307767989124 0.242375264174 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10901233497 0.0925447433944 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0557588969091 0.071462118173 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168243908936 0.151781067708 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0419765315338 0.0609392437508 69% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 12.6369458128 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.1260098522 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.9458128079 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 11.5310837438 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.27 8.32886699507 111% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 55.0591133005 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.