Many people think that countries have a moral obligation to help
each other, while others argue that aid money is misspent by the
governments that receive it and therefore international aid should
not be given to poor countries. Discuss these two points of view and
give your opinion.
The earth, we are living in, has become a global village. So, in this global village, countries have to depend on each other. There are poor and rich countries that depends on each others in some way or others. It is a situation, that is causing, people to think that if rich governments or countries should come up to help poor countries especially when the aid money, provided to poor countries, is being misspent. However, it is a difficult question to answer but anyway let's examine it further in our essay.
The first and formost thing that must be considered is curropt governments of poor countries. If we observe around the globe, we shall come up with the fact that there are enough poor-countries governments bearing the alegations of curroptions or facing legal charges against them. There are many prominant examples that prompt in our minds if we think about the matter such as ex-Pakistani governments or Venezvala.
Further, another crucial aspect of consideration may be of mismanagement. Different departments working in poor countries either under government or independantly are not well trained to maintain the aid money. These departments would be lacking in figures and facts about field. Resultingly, there were not well prepared to utilize aid efficiently.
However, even being many shortcomes, still this aid cause to help many poor countries to develop projects. Thus, these poor countries could develop their own resources. Further, it is a proved fact that when poor countries will be able adequate to feed their nations, it will surely bring positive effect on developed countries as well. For example, it may cause decline in the refugee stream that is being cause to hurt Europe or rich countries.
So, the conclusion or sum up of whole essay is that rich countries should keep helping poor countries, not just for poor countries but for their own sake as well.
- In the past people spent their entire lives doing one job But nowadays they change their jobs frequently Please give the reasons and your suggestions 92
- In the past people spent their entire lives doing one job But nowadays they change their jobs frequently Please give reasons and suggestions 74
- Many people think that countries have a moral obligation to help each other while others argue that aid money is misspent by the governments that receive it and therefore international aid should not be given to poor countries Discuss these two points of 53
- Many people think that countries have a moral obligation to help each other while others argue that aid money is misspent by the governments that receive it and therefore international aid should not be given to poor countries Discuss these two points of 46
- The graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six-month period in 2011. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 281, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cking in figures and facts about field. Resultingly, there were not well prepare...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
anyway, but, first, however, if, may, so, still, thus, well, for example, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1601.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 314.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09872611465 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77782413942 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.535031847134 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 468.0 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.5487874869 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.1764705882 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4705882353 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.76470588235 7.06120827912 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.270373638191 0.244688304435 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0892599378692 0.084324248473 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.066101717021 0.0667982634062 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148891038228 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0587374181041 0.056905535591 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.