IN MANY COUNTRIES, PEOPLE CAN GET A WIDE VARIETY OF FOOD TODAY AS A RESULT THEY EAT FOOD FROM OTHER REGION THAN THE LOCAL FOOD. DO U THINK THE ADVANTAGES OUTWEIGH THE DISADVANTAGES OF THE DEVELOPMENT.
Thanks to the incredible globalization and integration in the world, consuming foods from other regions is now much easier in the recent years. Some advocates this growing trend should be supported whilst the others blame this phenomenon for a number of consequences. In my opinion, the demerits of this are outnumbered by its merits owing to several reasons.
To begin with, opting for various categories of food is advantageous to inhabitants living in other areas. It is evident that citizens will have more choices to purchase at the markets, many of which are not only priced reasonably, but also significantly improve consumers’ health. For example, salmon fish, which are frequently imported from Japan, are highly recommended by pediatricians due to their price and the vital nutrients for children that cannot sufficiently be obtained by the local fish. Regarding the businesses trading and monetizing from selling these products, the sacrosanct monopoly made by the regional giants will soon be abolished and eventually replaced by the rigorous contention. To be specified, experienced yet ambitious food companies from other countries are gaining a great deal of attractions by advertising both appealing snacks for youngsters and delectable foods with unparalleled quality for housewives. The new competition created by the game changers is necessary since it will facilitate the research for new nourishment products, recruiting more competent indigenous employees and ultimately enhancing the quality of people’s lives.
That is not to say consuming overseas products does not bring any shortcomings. The domination of new food businesses poses a threat to businesses who are working relentlessly with a view to keeping the reputation of local specialities. This can be exemplified by the fact that the more market shares the foreign companies possess, the more popularity they acquire. Thus, the influence of local companies is likely to be diminished gradually and resulting in the potential disappearance of several regional companies in the long run.
In conclusion, the phenomenon of using imported foods is not hazardous to the development of local ones, instead it is one of the best methods to encourage the positive changes on different aspects such as the competitiveness or the health enhancement.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-04 | lonbimthoi | 89 | view |
- IN MANY COUNTRIES, PEOPLE CAN GET A WIDE VARIETY OF FOOD TODAY AS A RESULT THEY EAT FOOD FROM OTHER REGION THAN THE LOCAL FOOD. DO U THINK THE ADVANTAGES OUTWEIGH THE DISADVANTAGES OF THE DEVELOPMENT. 89
- SOME PEOPLE ARGUE THAT COUNTRIES SHOULD HAVE A MORAL OBLIGATION TO HELP EACH OTHER. ON THE OTHER HAND, SOME PEOPLE THINK THAT A LARGE NUMBER OF AID MONEY DOESN’T REACH THE POOR OF THE WORLD. DISCUSS BOTH VIEW, OPINION? 89
- SOME PEOPLE BELIEVE THAT WOMEN SHOULD PLAY AN EQUAL ROLE AS MEN IN COUNTRY’S POLICE OR MILITARY FORCES. OTHERS THINK WOMEN ARE NOT SUITABLE FOR THESE KIND OF JOBS. DISCUSS BOTH VIEWS AND GIVE OPINION? 84
- SOME PEOPLE BELIEVE THAT SUCCESS IS ABOUT HARD WORK AND DETERMINATION. OTHERS THINKS THAT SUCCESS HAS A CONNECTION WITH MONEY AND PERSONAL APPERANCE. DISCUSS BOTH VIEWS, GIVE YOUR OPINION AND SOME OF YOUR OWN EXPERIENCE 89
- SOME PEOPLE BELIEVE THAT WE SHOULD LIMIT THE AMOUNT OF VIOLENCE IN MOVIES AND TV PROGRAMMES. HOWEVER, OTHERS BELIEVE THAT VIOLENT CONTENT CAN BRING SOME POSITIVE EFFECTS. DISCUSS BOTH VIEWS AND GIVE YOUR OPINION. 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, regarding, so, thus, for example, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1988.0 1615.20841683 123% => OK
No of words: 358.0 315.596192385 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.5530726257 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34981470047 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19456366974 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.600558659218 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 618.3 506.74238477 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 54.7627536166 49.4020404114 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.0 106.682146367 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5714285714 20.7667163134 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.21428571429 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.20450888289 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0648598158978 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0559395787468 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112967460975 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0211718992156 0.056905535591 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 13.0946893788 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.21 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.3 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 123.0 78.4519038076 157% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.