Woven baskets characterized by a particular distinctive pattern have previously been found only in the immediate vicinity of the prehistoric village of Palea and therefore were believed to have been made only by the Palean people. Recently, however, archaeologists discovered such a "Palean" basket in Lithos, an ancient village across the Brim River from Palea. The Brim River is very deep and broad, and so the ancient Paleans could have crossed it only by boat, and no Palean boats have been found. Thus it follows that the so-called Palean baskets were not uniquely Palean.
Write a response in which you discuss what specific evidence is needed to evaluate the argument and explain how the evidence would weaken or strengthen the argument.
The author’s argument does not make a cogent case regarding the origin of the Palean basket. The implication that the lack of evidence available of Palean people traveling to the other side of the river and sharing their knowledge of basket creation with the people of Lithos means that the people from Lithos also share the creation of the baskets is flawed.
The author implies that because no boats have been found, the Palean people couldn’t have traveled to the other side of the river. As a result, they are not the only creators of the ornate baskets. There are many questions that arise from this simple assumption: Has there been absolutely no sign of any remnants of a boat found around the area? Could the boat have been destroyed? Has anyone checked the bottom of the lake? Are there any native people to the area aware of any of their stories that could illuminate this argument? The author clearly did not go into detail to explain the assumption that no boat has been found. Perhaps, if information was provided regarding the research that has been done, this point would stand, unfortunately that is not the case.
Furthermore, the author implies that the conditions we have today involving the river’s depth and broadness have been the same since the time the baskets were created. Again, no data is provided to support this basic idea. Current science is able to trace back physical conditions about the environment. It would be imperative to know what data has been provided as it relates to this idea. But the author’s lack of understanding of the pertinence of this information only serves to exacerbate the basic premise that his argument is flawed.
Lastly, no credit is given to the idea that humans, with or without a boat, could have managed to get to the other side of the river. Perhaps, an accident occurred and one person managed to get to the other side. Then that individual shared the idea of working on the baskets. I’m self-aware and understand my point lacks evidence, but this only proves my point to illustrate how simple it is for someone to connect dots that may very well have more nuanced explanations.
The author implies that the lack of boats seen mean that the baskets were developed on both sides of the river. While he doesn’t provide any evidence, aside from the idea that no boats have been found, there are many questions he has left unanswered. Could the boat be at the bottom of the river? Could there have been fluctuations in the depth of the river over time? Could one person have survived an adventure across the river and shared their knowledge? As it stands, the author’s argument is flawed and more data needs to be provided for his argument to be properly defended.
- Green tea has long been hailed as an excellent source of antioxidants, powerful anti-aging and immune-system boosting compounds. Many people therefore believe that the more cups they consume each day, the greater the benefits. Green tea, however, contains 46
- Universities should require students to take courses only within those fields they are interested in studying. 50
- The best leaders are those who encourage feedback from the people whom they lead. 58
- The primary goal of technological advancement should be to increase people's efficiency so that they have more leisure time.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning 50
- Understanding the past is of little use to those in current positions of leadership.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and 58
Comments
Essay evaluation report
argument 1 -- better to say: maybe people in Lithos have boats.
argument 2 -- better to say: maybe the river was not deep at that time.
argument 3 -- better to say: the sample is too small, archaeologists discovered only one "Palean" basket.
---------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 3.0 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 25 15
No. of Words: 479 350
No. of Characters: 2204 1500
No. of Different Words: 206 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.678 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.601 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.335 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 137 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 94 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 63 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 36 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 19.16 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 8.808 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.4 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.31 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.488 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.085 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...he creation of the baskets is flawed. The author implies that because no boats ha...
^^^
Line 2, column 477, Rule ID: OF_ANY_OF[1]
Message: Consider simply using 'of' instead.
Suggestion: of
...ere any native people to the area aware of any of their stories that could illuminate thi...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 375, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ns in the depth of the river over time? Could one person have survived an adventure a...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 592, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r his argument to be properly defended.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, lastly, may, regarding, so, then, well, while, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 19.6327345309 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.9520958084 69% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 11.1786427146 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 13.6137724551 118% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 28.8173652695 132% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 59.0 55.5748502994 106% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 16.3942115768 110% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2292.0 2260.96107784 101% => OK
No of words: 476.0 441.139720559 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81512605042 5.12650576532 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.67091256922 4.56307096286 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55026095609 2.78398813304 92% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 204.123752495 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.447478991597 0.468620217663 95% => OK
syllable_count: 723.6 705.55239521 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.96107784431 60% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.76447105788 103% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.70958083832 148% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.67365269461 119% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.22255489022 47% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 19.7664670659 126% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.8473053892 83% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 52.6913427424 57.8364921388 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.68 119.503703932 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.04 23.324526521 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.44 5.70786347227 60% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.25449101796 76% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.20758483034 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 6.88822355289 160% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.67664670659 128% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.184868190568 0.218282227539 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.05939505908 0.0743258471296 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0580885145006 0.0701772020484 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111047311862 0.128457276422 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0453957646114 0.0628817314937 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 14.3799401198 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 48.3550499002 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.197005988 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 12.5979740519 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.7 8.32208582834 93% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 98.500998004 95% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 12.3882235529 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.1389221557 86% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.9071856287 92% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.