The line chart below shows the number of men and women that smoke cigarettes in Australia.
The graph illustrates the quantity of male and female smokers in Australia from 1960 to 2000. Overall, the number of men smoking cigarettes decreased dramatically whereas there was a slight rise in woman smokers in the period. In addition, the number of the men was always higher than that of the women at each same year.
For the figure of men smoking cigarettes, there were about 6 million male smokers in 1960, and it fell significantly to 4 million in 1980. Between 1980 and 1995, the number of males decreased slightly and reached a low of 2.8 million. By 2000, there was a little upward trend of 3 million men.
For female smokers, the quantity of females increased rapidly by about 2.5 million from 1960 to 1975, and peaked at 3.5 million in 1975. However, it dropped gradually to 2 million between 1975 and 2000 with the decreasing rate at about 0.3 million female smokers per 5 years.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-08-27 | nothinghih | 79 | view |
| 2021-12-15 | Sarina9713 | 73 | view |
| 2019-08-12 | phmixu27 | 84 | view |
- The graph below shows information about the activities that Australian and New Zealand children enjoy doing the most in 2017. 73
- The graphs below show a comparison of the weekly expenses in the UK and the US, in 2010 56
- Some believe that students learn better in schools when they study in groups. Others say that student will learn better when they study own.Discuss both views and give your opinion. 61
- Some believe that students learn better in schools when they study in groups. Others say that students will learn better when they study own.Discuss both views and give your opinion. 67
- The graph below gives information from a report in 2010 about the use of energy in Australia since 1980 with projections until 2030 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, whereas, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 744.0 965.302439024 77% => OK
No of words: 158.0 196.424390244 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.70886075949 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.54539209256 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4982929599 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 106.607317073 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.575949367089 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 209.7 283.868780488 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.8388218142 43.030603864 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.0 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.75 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.125 5.23603664747 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.146242283505 0.215688989381 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0777172511197 0.103423049105 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.067853444702 0.0843802449381 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116191068798 0.15604864568 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101563505925 0.0819641961636 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.2329268293 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 77.57 61.2550243902 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.48 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.