The bar chart shows the percentage of children who participated in different activities in their leisure time in the UK in 2014.
The various activities that children in UK spent on their free time throughout 2014 is given in the bar chart. The data is measured in percentages. Over all, it can be clearly seen that watching TV or videos was the most popular activities.
On the on hand, there were three activities that had high participation rate. Firstly, UK children spent time watching TV or videos. The percentages were equal for boys and girls at 100%, the highest figures. Next, playing electronic or computer games was more popular for boys than girls at 80% and 60%. Similarly, the percentage of cycling in boys was around 20% higher than girls, at about 78%.
On the other hand, two activities were not much popular for children in UK. To begin with, the participation rate of skateboarding or rollerblading was the lowest. This activity was more interested in boys than girls at about 38 and 25. In contrast, the percentage of boys who did art and craft was around 25% lower than girls, at 58%.
- These days many countries provide free university education for all citizens, even though the cost of doing this is very high. What are the main benefits of free university education and are there any drawbacks ?Give reasons for your answer and include ex 73
- Being a celebrity - such as famous film star or sports personality - brings problems as well as benefits. Do you think that being a celebrity brings more benefits or more problems? 73
- In spite of the advance made in agriculture, many people in the world still go hungry.What is this the case? What can be done about this problem ? 73
- The following chart show the proportion of different areas of industry for projects at Amata Indusrtrial Park 100
- The bar chart shows the percentage of children who participated in different activities in their leisure time in the UK in 2014. 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, similarly, in contrast, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 812.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 171.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.7485380117 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61617157096 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67300723575 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.584795321637 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 233.1 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 22.4926829268 62% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 19.4084388862 43.030603864 45% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 67.6666666667 112.824112599 60% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 14.25 22.9334400587 62% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.23603664747 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.235801725967 0.215688989381 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0912783370619 0.103423049105 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.113577368769 0.0843802449381 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173817852702 0.15604864568 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0580204614055 0.0819641961636 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.1 13.2329268293 61% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.19 61.2550243902 121% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.3012195122 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.68 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.19 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 11.4329268293 52% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.9970731707 69% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.