many people disagree with a school policy which forces children to learn new languages.
It is sometimes argued that foreign languages should be included in the school curriculum as a compulsory subject. While I agree that there are certain drawbacks associated with this policy, I would argue that it is necessary for schoolchildren to study a new language.
On the one hand, there are several drawbacks involved in forcing students to study foreign languages. Firstly, many students do not have the aptitude for languages, which leaves the majority of them unable to develop an autonomous language learning. Therefore, they are more likely to fall behind their studies and disturbed by unnecessary stresses. Secondly, students often want to focus on their favorite subjects rather than languages which they think they will never use. This is particularly the case in gifted high schools, where students have to put more resources into their specialised subjects than in French or Chinese.
On the other hand, learning a foreign language is important for schoolchildren. One reason is that it can assist students in their studies when they take the advantage of the internet, which provides a considerable amount of fruitful and reliable information written in new languages, as a way to broaden their knowledge. In this case, the proficiency in the foreign languages help them to assimilate knowledge and gain an insight into the subjects efficiently in order to pass the exams with flying colors. Another reason is that foreign languages can also brighten schoolchildren’ career paths later in life. With labour market becoming more competitive, a good command of foreign languages can give them a competitive edge. This is true for those who apply for a job in international companies, where staffs need to communicate with customers coming from various parts of the world on a regular basic.
In conclusion, while there are some reasons to believe that schools should not incorporate new languages into the curriculum, I still believe that foreign languages play an important role in children’ life.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-15 | heoheo3012 | 78 | view |
| 2019-06-21 | Mr.Strange | 73 | view |
- Manifacture bricks for the building industry 84
- The chart below show the percentage of water use by different sectors in sydney, Australia, in 1997 and 2007. 73
- Some people arrgue that girls and boys should be educated saparately while others think that it is more advantaguous for children to study at a same school. What is your opinion? 73
- The pie charts below show how dangerous waste products are dealt with in three countries. 78
- The table shows the amount of money given in aid of technology of developing countries by charities in the US, EU and other countries from 2006 to 2010. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 632, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sed subjects than in French or Chinese. On the other hand, learning a foreign la...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, while, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1709.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 322.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30745341615 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23607819155 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0006638027 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565217391304 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 531.0 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.0741452656 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.071428571 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 7.06120827912 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.151590589001 0.244688304435 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0511299734874 0.084324248473 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0376314261541 0.0667982634062 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0915562849801 0.151304729494 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00155172041834 0.056905535591 3% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.