Participation by 5 to 14-year-old in selected leisure activities (Australia)
The bar chart gives information about how many 5 to 14-year teenagers engaged in the selected leisure activities in the Australia.
Overall, it can be seen that swimming is the most popular activity among both genders. Besides, the proportion of teenage boys who loved these activities is more than girls except watching TV and videos.
Regarding the boys, 100% of 5 to 14-year boys liked watching TV and videos. This figure was larger than that for bike riding and electronic/computer games, with 70% and 80% respectively. Skateboarding/rollerblading and art/craft were less popular among kid boys and had the similar figure, with 40% each.
With related to the girls, the figure for bike riding and electric/computer games were as high as that for art/craft, with around 60%. Watching TV and video was considered as most favorite activities among teenage girls, with 100%. And this number was 70% as high as that for Skateboarding.
- The media should include more stories which report good news rather than bad news To what extent you agree or disagree 66
- Some people think that it is better for students to learn local history than world history.Do you agree or disagree? 61
- The Maps below gives information on the Village Park ten years ago and now 62
- Along with the economic development, the environment of the world is being seriously polluted.What economic activities can cause harm to environment?What can be done to prevent this? 73
- The chart below gives information on the percentages of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010 83
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, regarding
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 19.0 33.7804878049 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 791.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 152.0 196.424390244 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20394736842 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.51124308557 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.39564833744 2.65546596893 128% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 106.607317073 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.592105263158 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 228.6 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.1482049534 43.030603864 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 87.8888888889 112.824112599 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8888888889 22.9334400587 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.0 5.23603664747 38% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.166271227002 0.215688989381 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0750217748501 0.103423049105 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.118345381344 0.0843802449381 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136235044913 0.15604864568 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.147559720786 0.0819641961636 180% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 61.2550243902 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.3012195122 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.58 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.