TPO 41
The lecture and the reading discuss the coal ash that it makes with burning coal. Although the passage claims that the government must creat strike and new roles for using coal ash, the speaker refutes this idea through several reasons which I will describe in this reporter.
First and foremost, the passage points out that taking a strike role like each company must be using liner-special material for coal ash. The lecturer, in contrast, rejects this by claiming that the role that company to use liner not sufficient. She believes that only a new company or land or pond can use these lines. An old company can not use line because it causes several damages. For example, harmful chemical component leak into groundwater and contaminant drink water so that makes environment damage. Hence, we need a new site as well as an old one.
Furthermore, the passage which states that a government must take strike role for handling and storing coal ash to prevent to use of it. However, the professor argues that taking strike roles does not prevent a consumer from using coal ash. Consider mercury for instance. The government made strikes role for handling and storage this chemical component for a long time. But, only a few consumer concerns about using mercury. Hence this solution does not function.
Finally, the article writes that new regulations increase the overall cost of the process for companies; as the result, companies will be obliged to increase the price of electricity which will make a negative impression on the public. However, the speaker says that it's true that the price increases but it worth it because if you calculate the money, companies will pay 15 million dollars and if they add this money to the electricity price. the overall increase will be 1% for each consumer which is very less for keeping the environment safe.
- TPO-25 - Integrated Writing Task 83
- TPO 48 78
- Famous entertainers and athletes deserve to have more privacy than they have now 73
- Some people believe that when busy parents do not have a lot of time to spend with their children the best use of that time is to have fun playing games or sports Other believe that it is best to use that time doing things together that are related to sch 70
- It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 427, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
... consumer concerns about using mercury. Hence this solution does not function. ...
^^^^^
Line 11, column 445, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...dd this money to the electricity price. the overall increase will be 1% for each co...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, so, well, for example, for instance, in contrast, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 10.4613686534 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 5.04856512141 218% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 12.0772626932 132% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 22.412803532 134% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 19.0 30.3222958057 63% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1555.0 1373.03311258 113% => OK
No of words: 313.0 270.72406181 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96805111821 5.08290768461 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46970435855 2.5805825403 96% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 145.348785872 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.543130990415 0.540411800872 101% => OK
syllable_count: 478.8 419.366225166 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 57.5906086154 49.2860985944 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.4705882353 110.228320801 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4117647059 21.698381199 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.70588235294 7.06452816374 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.394291185687 0.272083759551 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.129823031428 0.0996497079465 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0878746752056 0.0662205650399 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.245430811532 0.162205337803 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0455292008597 0.0443174109184 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.3589403974 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 53.8541721854 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 12.2367328918 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.06 8.42419426049 96% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 63.6247240618 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.