Company Top level Authorities should or should not take employees suggestions or ideas to take any decisions. Discuss
Modern economic growth is tied up with the formation of myriad companies around the globe in various sectors. Company's top-level management and employee relationship should go hand in hand for its tremendous future. This essay will argue that higher management should get regular feedback from employee for the growth of the company and for the existence of mutual benefits between the them.
Firstly, employees can be seen employed at all grades in any given company. So, they know the constraints that are imposed on them by top management that could inhibit them form working or delivering efficiently. For example, Tata consultancy service, well known IT company, paid less for a team, that was bombarded with lot of work, the team members tried to convey their feedback, which was unheard by top level management. Finally, they witnessed the team members dropping out of their company and the project was left incomplete. The company had to pay compensation for crossing the delivery date and breaching the service level agreement with the outsourced company.
Secondly, main reason being satisfaction that an employee should experience in his employment career to return the fruits of his hard work deliberately to the employer. For example, Astrazeneca private ltd, an IT company got regular feedback of employee and well paid them based on their experience and quantified work done. Within 2 years it grew as a well-known IT company having more than 3000 employees.
This essay we argued that employee feedback and suggestions should be considered by all growing companies. In my opinion, employee feedback, suggestions and ideas determine the future of any company to withstand the modern economic crisis and culture.
- Some people say that self-driving acrs will be a benefit to society, whole others believe they will cause more harm than good.Discuss both of these views and give your own opinion using relevant examples. 79
- Some people think that it would be better for large companies andindustry to move to regional areas outside large urban centres.Others believe that companies and industries should remain inmore urban areas. 55
- Environment pollution is too alarming to be managed by individuals. Real change can be made at the government level. What extent do you agree or disagree? 85
- Individuals today have more information about health than at any time in the past. Yet, people are increasingly suffering from fitnessand diet- related diseases. Why is this happening ? What can be done to prevent it ? 77
- Cheating and lying are sometimes acceptable. 72
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 383, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'them'?
Suggestion: the; them
...he existence of mutual benefits between the them. Firstly, employees can be seen em...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 267, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'companies'?
Suggestion: companies
...Tata consultancy service, well known IT company, paid less for a team, that was bombard...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 208, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'an' or 'IT'?
Suggestion: an; IT
.... For example, Astrazeneca private ltd, an IT company got regular feedback of employe...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 214, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'companies'?
Suggestion: companies
...example, Astrazeneca private ltd, an IT company got regular feedback of employee and we...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 368, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'companies'?
Suggestion: companies
...thin 2 years it grew as a well-known IT company having more than 3000 employees. T...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, well, for example, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.5418719212 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 8.36945812808 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 20.9802955665 124% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.75862068966 208% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1470.0 1207.87684729 122% => OK
No of words: 275.0 242.827586207 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34545454545 5.00649968141 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75554797238 2.71678728327 101% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 139.433497537 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.607272727273 0.580463131201 105% => OK
syllable_count: 430.2 379.143842365 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.7899833321 50.4703680194 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.076923077 104.977214359 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1538461538 20.9669160288 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.38461538462 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.33497536946 94% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.234411204825 0.242375264174 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0867525587442 0.0925447433944 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0599441291193 0.071462118173 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155007679983 0.151781067708 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0591923932775 0.0609392437508 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 12.6369458128 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.1260098522 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.9458128079 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.75 11.5310837438 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.21 8.32886699507 111% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 55.0591133005 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.