Students from disadvantaged families and rural areas are finding it difficult to get a university education. Some people believe that universities should help them. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Pursuing studies has become problematic for those living in poor background families and the countryside. In this respect, some perceive that universities are a great hand. To me, I agree wholeheartedly that these universities have countless interests in facing up to this issue, which make these academic places help these humans
Many hold this assumption that the most main beneficiaries are universities by supporting such pupils. In other words, by recruiting them in some industrial projects, universities would make a living. In doing so, since such students are generally dedicated and do not want to miss out the education, they make efforts to become involved in these areas. In effect, they seize the opportunity to not only receive educational support but also show their competence, playing a part in universities projects. This means such rural pupils with the underrepresented background are the potential source of revenue through which these academic places would make a bundle of money. For this reason, it has turned out to be a must for universities to help these individuals.
Adding further fuel to economic profits, that universities are capable of generating, is the fact that they would feasibly promote their ranks amongst others. As a general rule, most students, coming from poor backgrounds and the countryside, are talented and contribute to scientific research and inventions, putting the university one step ahead of the other. By way of illustration, the rank of the university would scale up, provided that one of these students discovered a new chemical substance. This serves to push back the frontiers of science and increase the rank of the university. Consequently, universities see the need to help pupils who have these criteria.
In conclusion, giving help to students, who are born in disadvantaged families and inhabit the country, is the bedrock of success. Indeed, by doing this, universities would have an impressive revenue and raise their ranks. Therefore, I subscribe to this view that universities should give a hand.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-03 | َalirezahosseini1994PEng | 78 | view |
- Students from disadvantaged families and rural areas are finding it difficult to get a university education. Some people believe that universities should help them. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
- These days it is very common to have people from two different generations mix in the same workplace. Are there more advantages or disadvantages to this situation? Give your own opinion and include relevant examples. 84
- Both the poor and the rich find the accessibility into university difficult. Do you agree or disagree? 11
- It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environment, such as the South Pole. What are advantages and disadvantages of this development? 89
- It is expected in the near future that there will be a higher proportion of old people compared to younger population in some countries. Is it a positive or negative development? Give your opinion and examples. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 331, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... these academic places help these humans Many hold this assumption that the most ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun hold seems to be countable; consider using: 'Many holds'.
Suggestion: Many holds
...academic places help these humans Many hold this assumption that the most main bene...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 355, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...orts to become involved in these areas. In effect, they seize the opportunity to n...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, if, so, therefore, in conclusion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 24.0651302605 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1760.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 327.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.38226299694 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25242769721 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07645867911 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.562691131498 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 546.3 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.8796684646 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.0 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4375 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5625 7.06120827912 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.229783054496 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.079619545884 0.084324248473 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0375538656421 0.0667982634062 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146278293392 0.151304729494 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0183357420946 0.056905535591 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.83 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.