The graph below compares figures for the production and consumption of energy in the US from 1950 to 2000. It also predicts figures for 2025.
The line graph shows the amount of energy generated and used in the united state of America between 1950 to 2000 and pedict amount that will be produce and consume in year 2025. The unit of measure is British thermal Unit. Overall, it is noticeable that the both generation and consumption Started on a low unit and increased significantly at different rate over the period shown.
In 1950, the amount of energy used by the Americans stood at approximately 30BUT. In contrast to this, what was generated was far low , his accounted for 25BUT. However, some years after both amount of energy produced and consumed fluctuated before rose gradually.
In 1975, he number of unit of energy generated and consumed was at above 50BUT and roughly 60BUT, respectively. The amount of energy generated jumped slightly to less than 100BUT in 2002. By 2025, the amount of energy that will be produce and consume by united state will stand at below 75BUT and above 125BUT, respectively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-14 | dilipkarki | 67 | view |
| 2019-11-25 | azizkhon | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-18 | Mario Nese | 89 | view |
| 2019-09-05 | Dele Omo | 67 | view |
| 2015-05-02 | bocahnakal | 70 | view |
- The chart below show reason why people go to work by bicycle and car. 73
- The chart below show the proportion of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English, in 2000 and 2010. 73
- The pie charts show reason why people go to work by bicycle or car 78
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology. 22
- The graph below shows average carbon dioxide emission per person in the united Kingdom, Sweden, Italy, and Portuguese between 1976 and 2007 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 134, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... to this, what was generated was far low , his accounted for 25BUT. However, some ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, in contrast, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 811.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 165.0 196.424390244 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.91515151515 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58402463422 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58265173776 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.575757575758 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 256.5 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.5283013446 43.030603864 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.1111111111 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3333333333 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.44444444444 5.23603664747 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.126389676323 0.215688989381 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.05375231994 0.103423049105 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0367636123233 0.0843802449381 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0901702426449 0.15604864568 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00991531750478 0.0819641961636 12% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.5 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.