Average household expenditures by major catagory
The pie charts given below illustrate the percentage of comparison average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in year 2010. Overall, it can be seen that housing was the biggest percentage in Malaysia. While, transport was the hugest percentage in Japan.
In Japan, the largest value was other goods and services, representing just over a quarter of all household, and it was still biggest percentage in Malaysia. Both of them just has low difference, which is Japan higher than Malaysia which was 3%. However housing was the second hugest percentage in Japan. While, housing was the biggest percentage in Malaysia.
In contrast, Malaysia the largest percentage was housing which was 34%, but housing was the third hugest percentage in Japan. Which is the second household was foods. Followed by transport and health care.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-05-14 | Huyenlbg87 | 84 | view |
| 2024-03-21 | nguyen thanh sang | 78 | view |
| 2023-12-18 | vuongthaolinh | 85 | view |
| 2023-12-13 | tieuquynh | 84 | view |
| 2023-10-13 | Ahmad_off | view |
- The GDP growth per year for three countries between 2007 and 2010. 67
- The main reasons for study among student of different age groups and the amount of support they received from employers. 67
- Comparison of different kind of energy production of France in two years 73
- Average household expenditures by major catagory 56
- In some countries, young people are encouraged to work or travel for a year between finishing high school and starting universities studies.Discuss the advantage and disadvantage for young people who decided to do this. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 212, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...was the biggest percentage in Malaysia. While, transport was the hugest percentage in...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 247, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...apan higher than Malaysia which was 3%. However housing was the second hugest percentag...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 306, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... the second hugest percentage in Japan. While, housing was the biggest percentage in ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 127, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Which” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...s the third hugest percentage in Japan. Which is the second household was foods. Foll...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, second, so, still, third, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 16.0 33.7804878049 47% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 703.0 965.302439024 73% => OK
No of words: 133.0 196.424390244 68% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28571428571 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.39596269041 3.73543355544 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71766810684 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 67.0 106.607317073 63% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.503759398496 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 208.8 283.868780488 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 22.4926829268 58% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.119820538 43.030603864 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 70.3 112.824112599 62% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.3 22.9334400587 58% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 6.2 5.23603664747 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0695367962681 0.215688989381 32% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0395166600317 0.103423049105 38% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0723068443977 0.0843802449381 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0637190379866 0.15604864568 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0462589144351 0.0819641961636 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.28 61.2550243902 95% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.3012195122 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.51 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.37 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 26.0 40.7170731707 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.9970731707 65% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.