US Spending Patterns between 1966 and 1996
The pie charts given below illustrate the percentage of comparison spending pattern in US between 1966 and 1996. Overall, it can be seen that food was the most positive trend in 1966, while cars was the most popular in 1996.
In 1966, food was the largest value, it representing almost a half off all spending. However the biggest percentage in 1996 was cars, it had percentage just over a half of all. The second most popular in 1996 was food, and cars was the second hugest in 1966. Both of them had fluctuated significantly, which are food was fallen 30% for four decade, and the opposite cars had grown 22% for forty years later.
Last change was seen in the remaining five spending, enrollment on the computers and restaurant, went up slightly for four decade. While, books, petrol, and furniture had fallen slightly in forty years later.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-10-11 | eva2106 | 78 | view |
| 2020-12-15 | Arshdeepmondair | 100 | view |
| 2020-12-15 | Arshdeepmondair | view | |
| 2020-03-13 | destrarastra | 67 | view |
| 2020-03-13 | Fuad Allatif | 73 | view |
- The GDP growth per year for three countries between 2007 and 2010. 67
- Comparison of different kind of energy production of France in two years 73
- US Spending Patterns between 1966 and 1996 56
- The comparison proportion of carbohydrates, protein and fat in three diets 67
- In some countries, young people are encouraged to work or travel for a year between finishing high school and starting universities studies.Discuss the advantage and disadvantage for young people who decided to do this. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 86, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...senting almost a half off all spending. However the biggest percentage in 1996 was cars...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 342, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'decade' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'decades'.
Suggestion: decades
... which are food was fallen 30% for four decade, and the opposite cars had grown 22% fo...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 409, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rs had grown 22% for forty years later. Last change was seen in the remaining fi...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 124, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'decade' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'decades'.
Suggestion: decades
...d restaurant, went up slightly for four decade. While, books, petrol, and furniture ha...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, second, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 19.0 33.7804878049 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 704.0 965.302439024 73% => OK
No of words: 147.0 196.424390244 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.78911564626 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.48200454523 3.73543355544 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47314232663 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 87.0 106.607317073 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.591836734694 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 197.1 283.868780488 69% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 23.8524107796 43.030603864 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 88.0 112.824112599 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.375 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.75 5.23603664747 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.220795358391 0.215688989381 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112486442976 0.103423049105 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.17125108452 0.0843802449381 203% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169094420054 0.15604864568 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.179043043383 0.0819641961636 218% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.2329268293 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 78.59 61.2550243902 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.64 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.