The comparison proportion of carbohydrates, protein and fat in three diets
The pie charts given below illustrate the percentage of comparison three diets, based proportion of carbohydrates , protein and fat. Overall, it can be seen that carbohydrates was the biggest percentage, while fat was the lowest percentage of all proportions in all off diets type.
In three of diets type, proportion of carbohydrates was the most percentage, it is representing just over a half of proportion in healthy diet type, it had value 60% in healthy for sport diet type. While in healthy diet type, carbohydrate was represented just a half of proportion, which is the percentage was at 50%. However in average diet type, it was jut almost a half proportion at 40%.
In contrast, protein and fat was the representing less than a half of proportion in the all of diet type. Which is fat was the lowest percentage, and protein was the second hugest or smallest of three diets. Both of them was represented almost about a proportion of carbohydrate.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-09-01 | dorae | 67 | view |
| 2024-07-16 | dorae | 73 | view |
| 2024-07-16 | dorae | 67 | view |
| 2024-07-11 | Trần Ánh Vy | 73 | view |
| 2023-10-13 | thanhboyzz | view |
- Comparison of different kind of energy production of France in two years 73
- US Spending Patterns between 1966 and 1996 56
- Average household expenditures by major catagory 56
- The main reasons for study among student of different age groups and the amount of support they received from employers. 67
- The comparison proportion of carbohydrates, protein and fat in three diets 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 114, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...diets, based proportion of carbohydrates , protein and fat. Overall, it can be see...
^^
Line 1, column 240, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...age, while fat was the lowest percentage of all proportions in all off diets type...
^^
Line 3, column 319, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...on, which is the percentage was at 50%. However in average diet type, it was jut almost...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, second, so, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 800.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 162.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.93827160494 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56762134501 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08018230843 2.65546596893 116% => OK
Unique words: 74.0 106.607317073 69% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.456790123457 0.547539520022 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 241.2 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.8745980687 43.030603864 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.0 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.25 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.875 5.23603664747 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.33044155178 0.215688989381 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.179266337438 0.103423049105 173% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0967783466986 0.0843802449381 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.263367528693 0.15604864568 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0581289382356 0.0819641961636 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.87 8.06136585366 85% => OK
difficult_words: 23.0 40.7170731707 56% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.