TPO 22
The lecture and the reading passage discuss merits and demerits of ethanol fuel that produces with some plants. Although the passage claims some arguments against ethanol fuel, the speaker refutes this idea through several reasons which I will describe in this reporter.
First and foremost, the passage points out that ethanol fuel releases carbon dioxide into the atmosphere when it is burning. The lecturer, in contrast, rejects this by claiming that using ethanol fuel not add carbon dioxide into the atmosphere. Because it makes from plants, and all plants need carbon dioxide for growing; hence, they remove CO2 from the atmosphere. Indeed, ethanol fuel helps reduce global warming.
Furthermore, unlike the passage which states, that producing ethanol fuel can reducing animal's food, the professor argues that Ethanol fuel cannot reduce animal's food. Ethanol fuel produces from the cellulose of plant that it finds in cell walls of plants. Also, animals do not eat trunk of plants. Hence, producing Ethanol fuel cannot reduction food animals.
Finally, although the reading passage says that ethanol price cannot compete with gasoline without government subsidies, the speaker disagrees by mentioning that government support will not always be needed. He adds that when more people use ethanol, producers will increase their production and subsequently the price of the ethanol decreases. He says that recent research showed that three-time greater produce of ethanol will result in a forty per cent drop in its price.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 375, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... remove CO2 from the atmosphere. Indeed, ethanol fuel helps reduce global warming...
^^
Line 13, column 316, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ot eat trunk of plants. Hence, producing Ethanol fuel cannot reduction food anima...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, furthermore, hence, so, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 10.4613686534 19% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 5.04856512141 178% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 22.412803532 103% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 30.3222958057 79% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1313.0 1373.03311258 96% => OK
No of words: 237.0 270.72406181 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.54008438819 5.08290768461 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92362132708 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.3438201407 2.5805825403 91% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 145.348785872 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.582278481013 0.540411800872 108% => OK
syllable_count: 386.1 419.366225166 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.6801330582 49.2860985944 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.0 110.228320801 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2307692308 21.698381199 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.38461538462 7.06452816374 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.45160391478 0.272083759551 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.183846741223 0.0996497079465 184% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0773642794938 0.0662205650399 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.277716749888 0.162205337803 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0508943563973 0.0443174109184 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.3589403974 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.8541721854 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.0289183223 93% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.85 12.2367328918 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.86 8.42419426049 105% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 63.6247240618 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.