Some people like to buy and eat their meals at restaurants frequently while others like to do this at home. Which do you prefer? Why?
Throughout history, food has played a prominent role in all societies. Because it is of paramount importance, researchers have always searched many ways for enhancing food quality. A controversial question which is often raised this idea is whether people prefer to buy their foods from a place that cook food or preparing their meals at a dweller. I would rather cook food at home rather than buying at a restaurant. In the following paragraphs, I will delve into the most outstanding reasons.
The first factor to be mentioned is that preparing food at a home is healthier than buy food at restaurants. To elaborate on my points, since people want to cook food at their home, they would rather use fresh materials than freezing them. Hence, they would buy fresh vegetables, meets, oil, and many other similar items daily. And, they try to cook healthy food. In other word, when individuals want to cook food, they may prepare meals with a few oil and salt. Therefore, this meal is healthier than other meals. In contrast, it is an arduous situation for restaurants that buy fresh materials every day; thus, they may freeze their meats and vegetables for a week. In addition, restaurants try to serve delicious meals for their buyers so that they cook food with a lot of salt and oil. In this situation, this food is more delicious than food that cooks at a home, but more salt and oil means more some chronic disease such as heart attack and blood pressure.
Another reason which deserves some word here is that cooking food at a home can improve cooperation between family members. To shed more light on this matter, when a mother wants to cook food at a kitchen, other family members also try to help their mother. In this situation, during prepare food, they would speak with each other and it helps them to spend adequate time with each other. In other word, in this era, people are busy, and they consume much time at their work; therefore, family members do not spend adequate time with each other. So, when people try to cook food at a dweller, they can spend time when they want to eat food and prepare food.
To wrap it up, all the aforementioned reasons lead us to the conclusion that preparing food at a home has many merits points rather than providing food at restaurants. I believe that people who cook food at a home not only cook healthier food but also make strong relationships with their family members.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 449, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[6]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun oil seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'little oil'.
Suggestion: little oil
...ook food, they may prepare meals with a few oil and salt. Therefore, this meal is healt...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 610, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ants that buy fresh materials every day; thus, they may freeze their meats and ve...
^^
Line 5, column 795, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...y cook food with a lot of salt and oil. In this situation, this food is more delic...
^^
Line 5, column 969, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...uch as heart attack and blood pressure. Another reason which deserves some word ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, may, so, therefore, thus, well, in addition, in contrast, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 43.0788530466 102% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 52.1666666667 105% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2065.0 1977.66487455 104% => OK
No of words: 427.0 407.700716846 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83606557377 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54576487731 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46288532484 2.67179642975 92% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 212.727598566 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.473067915691 0.524837075471 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 588.6 618.680645161 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 14.0 4.94265232975 283% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.190594941 48.9658058833 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.3333333333 100.406767564 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3333333333 20.6045352989 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.28571428571 5.45110844103 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.248338793494 0.236089414692 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0941596901726 0.076458572812 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0646591429563 0.0737576698707 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176770969981 0.150856017488 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0230780297326 0.0645574589148 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 11.7677419355 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 58.1214874552 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 10.9000537634 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.11 8.01818996416 89% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 86.8835125448 77% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.