The graph below shows the number of university graduates in Canada from 1992 to 2007.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
this essays will describe number of university graduates in canada from 1992 tp 2007. from the data between 1992 to 2007 females graduates more bigger amount rather than males graduates. year by year, many up and down alumnus of university graduates in canada especially 1992 to 2001. However, since 2002 show that continuous add number still counting surplus until 2006.
some phenomenon we can saw at 1996 number of graduates downgrade than year before, maybe at that time crisis of economics made struggel some student not graduates in 1996.
GAP between males graduates and females graduates recently looks like females still super power than males. Actually this is also relate to job seeker of females plenty of males. In 1992, graduates of female around 100.000 persons and makes around 70.000 persons. Fast forward to 2006, females graduate over 140.000 persons and males around 90.000 people.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | d.baquan123@gmail.com | 67 | view |
| 2019-11-20 | cindycornelia98 | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-20 | cindycornelia98 | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-17 | WAFA | 78 | view |
| 2019-11-03 | Anbill | 67 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
this essays will describe number of universi...
^^^^
Line 1, column 87, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: From
... graduates in canada from 1992 tp 2007. from the data between 1992 to 2007 females g...
^^^^
Line 1, column 140, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'bigger' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: bigger
... between 1992 to 2007 females graduates more bigger amount rather than males graduates. yea...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 188, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Year
...ger amount rather than males graduates. year by year, many up and down alumnus of un...
^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Some
...still counting surplus until 2006. some phenomenon we can saw at 1996 number of...
^^^^
Line 9, column 131, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'related'.
Suggestion: related
...power than males. Actually this is also relate to job seeker of females plenty of male...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, however, look, may, so, still
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 767.0 965.302439024 79% => OK
No of words: 145.0 196.424390244 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28965517241 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.47010008196 3.73543355544 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.25571015417 2.65546596893 85% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.668965517241 0.547539520022 122% => OK
syllable_count: 219.6 283.868780488 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.33902439024 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.3820703706 43.030603864 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.2222222222 112.824112599 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.1111111111 22.9334400587 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213303826077 0.215688989381 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0982793145378 0.103423049105 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.082509238489 0.0843802449381 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14201974856 0.15604864568 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.104922700734 0.0819641961636 128% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 61.2550243902 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.3012195122 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 11.4140731707 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.