The graph below shows the number of university graduates in Canada from 1992 to 2007.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph indicates the number of students graduating in Canada over a period of 15 years (1992 – 2007).
Overall, the figure for the female university graduates was higher than that of the male university graduates during the period shown. Also, the numbers of both female and male students graduating increased gradually from 1992 to 1995, then declined slightly between 1996 and 1999, and grew constantly again from 2000 to 2007.
In 1992, around 100,000 female students graduated from universities in Canada, while the figure for male university graduates was 70,000. From 1992 to 1995, the figures of female and male students graduating from universities increased steadily. However, in 1998 the numbers of female and male university graduates hit a low of around 100,000 graduates and 70,000 graduates respectively.
Between 2000 and 2007, the numbers of female and male students graduated from universities in Canada rose significantly. Especially, in 2006 the number of female students graduating in Canada reached a peak of nearly 150,000 graduates.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2020-01-29 | d.baquan123@gmail.com | 67 | view |
2019-11-20 | cindycornelia98 | 73 | view |
2019-11-20 | cindycornelia98 | 73 | view |
2019-11-17 | WAFA | 78 | view |
2019-11-03 | Anbill | 67 | view |
- The graph below shows the number of university graduates in Canada from 1992 to 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The table shows forested land in millions of hectares in different parts of the world.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.You should spend about 20 minutes on this task. 56
- The graph below shows the number of university graduates in Canada from 1992 to 2007. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- Some organisations believe that their employees should dress smartly Others value quality of work above appearance Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 67
- The graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six month period in 2011 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 919.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 166.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.53614457831 4.92477711251 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58944267634 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79365480784 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 76.0 106.607317073 71% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.457831325301 0.547539520022 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 261.0 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.5241919559 43.030603864 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 114.875 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.75 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.25 5.23603664747 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.271598211366 0.215688989381 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.168828959692 0.103423049105 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.045939494542 0.0843802449381 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.208774820162 0.15604864568 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0161465311732 0.0819641961636 20% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.85 11.4140731707 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.39 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.