The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English, in 2000 and 2010.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The pie charts illustrate the percentage of bilingual and multilingual British students in 2000 and 2010, in a specific university.
Overall, the percentage of students who knew just English decreased significantly while the proportion of multilingual increased.
By the pie charts it is concluded that the students liked to learn another language increased from 20% in 2000 to 10% in 2010. By that time, pupils were reluctant to learn french and caused a 5% decline. Learning german witnessed a steady approach with no changes, stayed at 10%.
Spanish learners, who were the numerous in both years, grew up from 30 to 35 percent in 2000 and 2010, respectively. The other group that observed a growth were multilinguals who knew more than two languages except English, and went up for 5 percent from 10 to 15 percent. At last, the pupils who learned another language except french, german, and Spanish were 15 percent in 2000 and increased to 20% in 2010.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-09 | ppatel | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-07 | Duong Linh | 61 | view |
| 2019-12-24 | nguyentuananh76 | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-17 | Jesslynindah | 84 | view |
| 2019-12-01 | Gre user | 78 | view |
- governments should spend money on railways rather than roads.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 56
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010. 78
- The maps below show the center of a small town called Islip as it is now and plans for its development.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- The table shows the Proportions of Pupils Attending Four Secondary School Types between 2000 and 2009 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010. 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 811.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 160.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06875 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55655882008 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8402175863 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.58125 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 218.7 283.868780488 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.6947443329 43.030603864 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.375 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.125 5.23603664747 21% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.236125135884 0.215688989381 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108104393188 0.103423049105 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.047976065861 0.0843802449381 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14299721816 0.15604864568 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0251858764948 0.0819641961636 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.