Today the internet and TV have created chance for ordinary people to become famous. Is it a positive or negative development?

In today’s modern world the Internet and television are the predominant media which provide everyday people with an opportunity to gain fame. I completely believe that this might be beneficial while drawbacks should not be neglected.

On the one hand, being celebrity throughout the internet and television has some benefits for normal people. Firstly, if they use this equal chance which is provided by these media, they can earn an enormous wealth. YouTube, for instance, lays the groundwork for all people with any kinds of skill around the world to show their capability and ability by uploading some educational videos on this website. Doing this might advert their talent and subsequently be a source of income. Secondly, some TV shows are aimed at discovering golden talents among everyday people in societies. These programs assist people especially those from the impoverished families to flourish and display their talents on the stage which an array of investors and well-known companies’ CEOs are watching and searching for talented persons.

On the other hand, there are some negative consequences which should be considered. Those usual persons who lack genius utilize the internet to do illegal activities easily would might have detrimental impact on societies. Take pornographic contents like films and photo which are uploaded on some webpages as an example; each person has easy access to the Internet and can do what should not be done. Moreover, TV programs sometimes fame somebodies that does not enjoy ample competence. There can be found some individuals who just by paying a great deal of money to participate in some special program to become a reputed person.

In conclusion, I opine that the plus points of TV and the Internet for ordinary people outweigh the negatives.

Votes
Average: 8 (2 votes)
Essays by the user:

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, well, while, for instance, in conclusion, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1528.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 292.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23287671233 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67920307272 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.619863013699 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 480.6 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.833549783 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.142857143 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8571428571 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.92857142857 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189092722607 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0658382187468 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0609646174594 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135535928618 0.151304729494 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0709732347654 0.056905535591 125% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.44 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.