Some people think that a sense of competition in children should be encouraged. Others believe that children who are taught to cooperate rather than compete become more useful adults.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
While many people appreciate the competitive state of children in their developmental milestones, others propose that it is more beneficial for them to closely cooperate with people. From my perspective, I believe that interpersonal coordination is the key to their success.
On one hand, there is no denying that competitiveness tends to be encouraged by parents since their children were little children. By way of illustration, primary children seem to be familiar with their parents’ comparison between them and their peers. After a day in school, when they get home, their parents may ask some questions like “Did you got an A?”, “Did you do these maths completely and correctly?”, to name but a few. On account of that, children might be brought up with a sense of competition. They bear in mind that they have to be a winner, they have to be on top. In some circumstances, that is a cost-effective measure to boost children’s ability. Notwithstanding, it unwontedly might form their rivalry and the undue need of showing their ego.
On the other hand, the opponents of this view may claim that in this contemporary era, connection between human beings is advised to enhance. Indeed, the more brains use in solving problems, the faster and the more effective results will be. Therefore, today’s parents have a tendency of leading their children to have interpersonal skills in order that their children will be more brilliant in labour market. Moreover, if youngers grasp the importance of cooperation, they will learn how to share their ideas, how to respect their teams. Besides, being grounded, which is one of the precious characteristics, may be formed carefully.
In short, it is undenied the positive results competitiveness bring to us, I propose that knowing how to connect and coordinate with others necessitate being developed for subsequent generation.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-07 | Mario Nese | 89 | view |
| 2019-10-03 | dlswife | 84 | view |
| 2019-07-29 | Omfiann | 56 | view |
| 2019-06-24 | Lilly T | 78 | view |
| 2019-06-10 | Mishika sugandhi | 84 | view |
- Nowadays children play less with others and this has an impact on their development What are the reasons for this Does it have a good or a bad effect on children 90
- The table below gives information about employment sectors in which people from 3 age groups worked 85
- In your opinion why is the circus still a popular form of entertainment in the modern electronic age Support your opinion with reasons and examples from your own knowledge and experience 56
- Some people want the government to spend more money for looking life on other planets however others think it is waste of public money when there are so many problems on earth that the government should be solving Discuss both views and give your opinion 79
- Plastic shopping bags contribute to the pollution of land and sea. Some people think it should be banned. Do you agree or disagree? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 362, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'an' or 'A' is left.
Suggestion: an; A
...k some questions like 'Did you got an A?', 'Did you do these maths co...
^^^^
Line 9, column 19, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...owing their ego. On the other hand, the opponents of this view may claim tha...
^^
Line 13, column 39, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'results'' or 'result's'?
Suggestion: results'; result's
... In short, it is undenied the positive results competitiveness bring to us, I propose ...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 196, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ng developed for subsequent generation.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, while, in short, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 24.0651302605 166% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1620.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 304.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32894736842 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.2679013036 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582236842105 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 486.9 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.2738281347 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.0 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2666666667 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.46666666667 7.06120827912 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.195884327402 0.244688304435 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0746315021492 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0497560197775 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121265079282 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0335050573677 0.056905535591 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.