The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.
The line graph compares how much fish and three types of meat were consumed in one country in Europe from 1979 to 2004. Units are measured in grams per person per week.
Overall, the amount of chicken being eaten increased dramatically over the period given while the consumption of beef, lamb and fish decreased. It is also noticeable that at the start of the period until 1987, people consumed beef the most and in the following years, it was replaced by chicken.
The figure of chicken consumption started just under 150 grams/person/week then rose to just over 200 grams/person/week in 1998 overtaking beef as the most consumed. The number fluctuated in the succeeding years before rocketing up to approximately 250 grams/person/week in the final year.
In 1979, the amount of beef and lamb which were eaten began at around 220 and 150 grams/person/week respectively. Then the numbers displayed a significant drop to roughly 110 grams/person/week for beef and almost 60 grams/person/week in 2004. With regard to consumption of fish it hovered between approximately 60 grams/person/week and just under 50 grams/person/week throughout the period.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-24 | pateldhruv1708 | 67 | view |
| 2020-01-22 | mary.ssherr | 67 | view |
| 2020-01-13 | manhstorm | 56 | view |
| 2020-01-13 | manhstorm | 56 | view |
| 2020-01-02 | happyhappy | 61 | view |
- Some people say that television is useful for education while others say it is useful only for entertainment. Discuss both views and give your opinion? 67
- The chart shows the changes that took place in three different areas of crime in Newport city centre from 2000-2012. 11
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981 1991 and 2001 80
- The table below shows the production of cacao beans in six regions between 1992 and 1998 73
- The graphs below show the total production and sources of electricity in two countries in 1980 and 2000. 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, then, while, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 981.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 183.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.3606557377 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67800887145 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.5876304158 2.65546596893 135% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595628415301 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 270.0 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.9548292299 43.030603864 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.0 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3333333333 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.55555555556 5.23603664747 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.107168658506 0.215688989381 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0548120604431 0.103423049105 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0732143388137 0.0843802449381 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0810700899802 0.15604864568 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0657627625237 0.0819641961636 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 11.4140731707 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.48 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.