TPO 54
Both of the provided materials are discussing salinity reduction of the Salton Sea. The reading avers how a recent increase in the amount of salt present in the lake's water endangers the lives of fish and birds local to the environment. Then the author provides three possible solutions for this issue. Conversely, the lecture finds these solutions implausible and impractical and opposes each of the author's points.
First, the reading suggests a method of decreasing salinity by exploiting desalination facilities, in which water evaporates and restored to liquid form while leaving the salts behind. However, the professor refutes this point by stating that the salt is not the only remnant of the lake water evaporation. Moreover, the desalination process can induce health problems by emitting selenium, one of the products of the process, into the air. This toxic chemical can imperil people's life.
Second, the reading proposes another solution by adjusting the lake's water using ocean water. Nonetheless, the lecturer contends that constructing the mentioned pipelines and canals would be a costly operation since the nearest ocean is at least one-hundred kilometres far from the site. Thus, this installation requires a vast fortune, which most likely cannot be sustained by the local administration.
Third, the reading states that organizing the lake into various-sized divisions can be profitable for the small sections are allowed to get saltier while the central part is lightened using freshwater. Notwithstanding, the lecture disputes this method by mentioning frequent geological activities around the pond. Thus, if an earthquake takes place in the Salton area, those walls will be destructed, and the water from different sections is merged back together.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-24 | YasamanEsml | 90 | view |
| 2023-07-24 | YasamanEsml | 85 | view |
| 2023-07-20 | Take | 78 | view |
| 2023-07-20 | Take | 90 | view |
| 2023-07-20 | Take | 76 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, first, however, if, moreover, nonetheless, second, so, then, third, thus, while, at least
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 12.0772626932 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 22.412803532 45% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1517.0 1373.03311258 110% => OK
No of words: 273.0 270.72406181 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.55677655678 5.08290768461 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90018763207 2.5805825403 112% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 145.348785872 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.630036630037 0.540411800872 117% => OK
syllable_count: 464.4 419.366225166 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.1105218732 49.2860985944 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.357142857 110.228320801 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5 21.698381199 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.21428571429 7.06452816374 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.3589403974 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 53.8541721854 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 12.2367328918 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.07 8.42419426049 120% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 63.6247240618 149% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.2008830022 134% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.