In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport.
Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Whether the form of financial support should be given to the construction of new railroad lines or the improvement of the current public transportation has been a major topic of concern in modern society. In my opinion, it is vital for global citizens to focus on building modern railway lines because of some immense benefits they may bring about.
On the one hand, improving the standards of the used railways could have some clear advantages. First and foremost, the process of continuing to use without spending much money on raising the standards of the aforementioned railroads would exert an substantial impact on the economy of the whole world. Secondly, the amount of time for the development would not last so long that it is going to be simpler for international individuals to have access to those conventional railways. However, if there are so many damaged railway lines, it would be more technical and elaborate for governments to support.
On the other hand, I contend that, for accelerating the speed of train between massive metropolitan cities, which is right now considered an urgent conundrum in the global world, it is more essential for the global inhabitants to erect more and more contemporary and even cutting-edge railroad lines, simultaneously, the erection would be of paramount importance to the sustainable development of the international community. The first benefit of this is that the new ways for this type of mass transit would give the passengers the convenience of visiting many tourist attractions. The second advantage is, therefore, the gradual process of trading goods for customers of many people running their businesses would be mitigated because of the advanced technology the new ways may bring about.
From the issues outlined above, one may conclude that the construction of new railway lines would outweigh the development of the used railroads for the two valid reason that accelerating the process of delivering products and the convenience of traveling under today’s context of globalization and international integration.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-02-20 | MinyiChu | 67 | view |
| 2024-02-03 | Wardiati Yusuf | 61 | view |
| 2024-02-03 | Wardiati Yusuf | 61 | view |
| 2024-02-03 | Wardiati Yusuf | 67 | view |
| 2023-12-30 | Tường Vân | 73 | view |
- In the past, lectures were the traditional method of teaching large numbers of students. Nowadays, new technology is increasingly being used to teach students.Do the advantages of this new approach outweigh the disadvantages? 73
- Many people decide on a career path early in their lives and keep to it. This, they argue, leads to a more satisfying working life. To what extent do you agree with this view? What other things can people do in order to have a satisfying working life? 61
- Environmental protection is the responsibility of politicians not individuals because individuals can do little. Agree or disagree? 84
- Some people think that museums should be enjoyable places to entertain people, while others believe that the purpose of museums is to educate. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 84
- Some people think that museums should be enjoyable places to entertain people, while others believe that the purpose of museums is to educate. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 247, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...he aforementioned railroads would exert an substantial impact on the economy of th...
^^
Line 9, column 272, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rect more and more contemporary and even cutting-edge railroad lines, simultaneou...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1767.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 330.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35454545455 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26214759535 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09608746255 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551515151515 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 547.2 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 20.2975951904 163% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 95.1472542956 49.4020404114 193% => OK
Chars per sentence: 176.7 106.682146367 166% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.0 20.7667163134 159% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207433744868 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0817413931037 0.084324248473 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0344420754723 0.0667982634062 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124797079771 0.151304729494 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0374230808736 0.056905535591 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.3 13.0946893788 155% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.52 50.2224549098 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.3 11.3001002004 153% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.34 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.96 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 10.1190380762 150% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.