The charts below shows the value of one country’s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016. The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The data given compares the billions of dollars exported by one country among 5 different industries from 2015 to 2016 and their fluctuation rates.
Overall, it can be clearly seen an upward trend towards 2016 where mostly all the sectors showed an increase in their exportation except for gems and jewellery sector.
First of all, there are two main categories such as petroleum and engineering, which represented more than 50% together, in 2015 with a slight increase for the year after. However, textiles is the group of goods that showed the most notorious upward trend, jumping up over 15% ending 2016 with more than 32 billion exported. The agricultural industry products behave steadily during those years.
On the other hand, gems and jewellery group was affected by a fall of 5.18%, passing from 42 to 40.5 billions of dollars in exported goods.
- The charts below shows the value of one country’s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016. The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the 67
- The charts below shows the value of one country’s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016. The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the 84
- The charts below shows the value of one country’s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016. The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the 56
- The charts below shows the value of one country’s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016. The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the 56
- Task 2: Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation, such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money. Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 13, column 100, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '5 billion'.
Suggestion: 5 billion
... a fall of 5.18%, passing from 42 to 40.5 billions of dollars in exported goods.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, well, except for, such as, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 728.0 965.302439024 75% => OK
No of words: 142.0 196.424390244 72% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12676056338 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.45201032557 3.73543355544 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53149179422 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.732394366197 0.547539520022 134% => OK
syllable_count: 202.5 283.868780488 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.6105142279 43.030603864 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.333333333 112.824112599 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6666666667 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.0 5.23603664747 248% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.229477455709 0.215688989381 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0989180214536 0.103423049105 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0614740976882 0.0843802449381 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1273163519 0.15604864568 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.064674799175 0.0819641961636 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.77 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.