Some people like to eat in restaurants and at foodstands, others like to eat at home. Which do you prefer? Give reasons and examples to support your choice.
food industrial is one of the most important works to do all around the which could lead a person or a group to be rich or famous. however, many people still prefer to prepare and have their meal at home not in a public space. In my view, there is no doubt to eat and make food in a private place. I feel this way for some reasons, which I will explore in the following paragraphs.
First of all, healthiness is a distinguishing aspect of a meal that prepared at a house than a restaurant. Recent researches exposed that industrialized way of making food is the main element reasoned to an increase in number of individuals who get cancer. therefore, safety in food preparing for enormous number of people is a vital part of this business because just one mistake could be the final one for life of a guy. my personal experience is a compelling example of this, when I was a student at school eating at a fastfood made sick which concluded to one week absence in classes.
Secondly, making food at home is cheaper than eating at restaurants or food stands. In this days restaurant as a business is a mony making one, which means that profit of preparing food materials is better that expected to who starts this kind of work. Consequently, people could buy and make food by their own in a really cheap way. For instance, there is fastfood nexdoor of my home which sells chicken sandwiches, to buy a sandwich you must pay two times more than buy one kilo of the same kind of chicken meat.
In conclusion, I am of the opinion that food, which prepared at home is not only healthier than one made at a restaurant, but also cheaper.
- TPO 45- Question 1 71
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Parents are the best teachers. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- TPO 43 80
- What do you want most in a friend someone who is intelligent or someone who has a sense of humor or someone who is reliable Which one of these characteristics is most important to you Use reasons and specific examples to explain your choice 73
- TPO 51 Writing IndependentDo you agree or disagree with the following statement?Movies and television have more negative effects than positive effects on the way young people behave. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Food
food industrial is one of the most important...
^^^^
Line 1, column 132, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: However
...person or a group to be rich or famous. however, many people still prefer to prepare an...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 258, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Therefore
...n number of individuals who get cancer. therefore, safety in food preparing for enormous ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 424, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: My
...uld be the final one for life of a guy. my personal experience is a compelling exa...
^^
Line 7, column 94, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'days'' or 'day's'?
Suggestion: days'; day's
... at restaurants or food stands. In this days restaurant as a business is a mony maki...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, however, if, really, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, for instance, i feel, in conclusion, kind of, no doubt, first of all, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 43.0788530466 46% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 52.1666666667 82% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1344.0 1977.66487455 68% => OK
No of words: 300.0 407.700716846 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.48 4.8611393121 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.48103885553 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64894947731 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 212.727598566 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.543333333333 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 418.5 618.680645161 68% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.6003584229 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.925963379 48.9658058833 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.384615385 100.406767564 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0769230769 20.6045352989 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.3076923077 5.45110844103 244% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221819130132 0.236089414692 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0876287213339 0.076458572812 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0675658870492 0.0737576698707 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153673661919 0.150856017488 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0130030084233 0.0645574589148 20% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 11.7677419355 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 58.1214874552 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.0 10.9000537634 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.72 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 86.8835125448 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.