Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems. To what extent do you agree or disagree ? what other measures do you think might be effective ?
In last decades, several surveys have been conducted to ascertain the best means of diminishing traffic and pollution problems. Whereas, some people are of the opinion that increasing the price of petrol is the underlying element for lessening traffic congestion, I conceive that there are various fundamental reasons, which trigger this phenomena.
The population of cities have experienced a dramatic expansion owing to the high incidence of the immigration from rural areas to cities. As consequence the number of vehicles in the Roads rise markedly. Moreover, the pollution, which are made by vehicles exhausts, pose threat on people health and implicated in various terminal diseases, such as cancer, asthma. The people, having conservative perspective to this theme believe that government cannot stimulate people to utilize public transport by granting environmentally friendly remarks on television or newspaper. Hence, people should be induced to use public transport by increasing the price of the petrol. Nevertheless, this methods cannot eradicate traffic problems, it alleviates damaging consequences of this obstacles.
Although, remarks admitted by relevant persons seem reasonable, some people, myself included, with radical conception to the world affairs perceive that rising price of petrol just have short-term affect on traffic and also it has an adverse impact on people's economic circumstances. Thus, when price of petrol increase people should undergo drawback of this action by increasing the cost of life. I think the government should determine a better ways to controll traffic. For instance, they should dispense better public transport and subsidize services, by giving government grants to the companies that provide those services. In addition, they can teach children in school to be green to deliver better members to society in future.
In conclusion, nonetheless, increasing the price of petrol has great impact on the volume of traffic, I think the disadvantages of this plan outweigh benefit, thereby governments should formulate new policies to decrease traffic and pollution without any drawbacks on people life.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2014-09-22 | uday.narang | 60 | view |
- Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems. To what extent do you agree or disagree ? what other measures do you think might be effective ? 63
- Some people think that parents should teach children how to be good members of society. Others, however, believe that school is the place to learn this. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 70
- "prevention is better than cure " out of a country's health budget, a large proportion should be diverted from treatment spending on health education and prevention measure . 67
Sentence: Whereas, some people are of the opinion that increasing the price of petrol is the underlying element for lessening traffic congestion, I conceive that there are various fundamental reasons, which trigger this phenomena.
Description: A determiner/pronoun, singular is not usually followed by a noun, plural, common
Suggestion: Refer to this and phenomena
the number of vehicles in the Roads rise markedly.
the number of vehicles in the Roads rises markedly.
the pollution, which are made by vehicles exhausts, pose threat on people health and implicated in various terminal diseases
the pollutions, which are made by vehicles exhausts, pose threat on people health and implicate in various terminal diseases
Sentence: Moreover, the pollution, which are made by vehicles exhausts, pose threat on people health and implicated in various terminal diseases, such as cancer, asthma.
Description: The fragment vehicles exhausts , is rare
Suggestion: Possible agreement error: Replace exhausts with verb, base: uninflected present, imperative or infinitive
Description: A noun, plural, common is not usually followed by a noun, singular, common
Suggestion: Refer to people and health
Sentence: Nevertheless, this methods cannot eradicate traffic problems, it alleviates damaging consequences of this obstacles.
Description: A determiner/pronoun, singular is not usually followed by a noun, plural, common
Suggestion: Refer to this and methods
Description: A determiner/pronoun, singular is not usually followed by a noun, plural, common
Suggestion: Refer to this and obstacles
Sentence: ...that rising price of petrol just have short-term affect on traffic and also it has an adverse impact on people's economic circumstances.
Description: The word affect is not usually used as a noun, singular, common
Suggestion: Refer to affect , did you mean effect?
that rising price of petrol just have short-term affect
that rising price of petrol just has short-term effect
government should determine a better ways to controll traffic.
government should determine better ways to control traffic.
Sentence: In conclusion, nonetheless, increasing the price of petrol has great impact on the volume of traffic, I think the disadvantages of this plan outweigh benefit, thereby governments should formulate new policies to decrease traffic and pollution without any drawbacks on people life.
Description: A noun, plural, common is not usually followed by a noun, singular, common
Suggestion: Refer to people and life
Sentence: I think the government should determine a better ways to controll traffic.
Error: controll Suggestion: No alternate word
flaws:
No. of Grammatical Errors: 10 2
Double check grammar issues after essay writing.
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 6.0 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 10 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 1 2
No. of Sentences: 14 15
No. of Words: 322 350
No. of Characters: 1790 1500
No. of Different Words: 189 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.236 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.559 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.826 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 165 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 120 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 85 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 52 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 23 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 9.577 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.714 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.348 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.529 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.061 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5