It is more harmful to compromise one's own beliefs than to adhere to them.
Basically, I partially agree with this statement. Sometimes, it is harmful to compromise our own beliefs than to adhere to them when our beliefs are good. However, we should also be aware of the unstated assumption that the statement relied on. Are there only two choices? Whether we compromise our beliefs or stick to our beliefs? Couldn't we integrate our beliefs with others'?
The primary reason that I partially agree with the statement is that if our own beliefs have a great nature compared to others, why we should give them up? I had a personal experience that I gave up my own beliefs and obey others and it turned out to be a sad ending. When I was in junior high school, I had a great performance in every course. One day, two of my best friends asked me to help them cheat on the math test because they did not prepare for it. I was scared to say yes as I knew that it was wrong to help people cheat. But I compromise my beliefs and did help them cheat by letting them glimpse my answers during the test. Of course, the teachers found out that they were cheating and I was the helper. So all of our test scores were invalided and we needed to retake the test. That is really a lessen-learned. After that, I believe that it is always wise to keep my own faiths if mine is more reasonable and justifiable.
However, sometimes it could also be true that other beliefs are stronger and even better than mine. In such cases, instead of either fully compromise or strongly adhere to my faiths, I would try to seek the possibility to integrate my faiths to others'. When it comes to the discussions of business strategy, there are plenty of great ideas. Therefore, it is not always as the statement that either we compromise our beliefs to others or we adhere to ours. There are other ways to solve the dissimilar people's beliefs.
To sum up, when the nature of our beliefs is better than others', I would agree with the statement as compromising our beliefs could lead to an unwanted result as shown in my personal experience. Nonetheless, instead of only having two extreme options, we could also try to mix the diverse beliefs so to create better faiths or solutions.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-29 | batterylow_123 | 58 | view |
| 2024-04-09 | guozhishan | 50 | view |
| 2024-04-03 | Zahid6400 | 50 | view |
| 2024-01-27 | LauraTing | 66 | view |
| 2023-11-07 | ibralieah1030 | 66 | view |
- The following appeared in a memo to the board of directors of Bargain Brand Cereals."One year ago we introduced our first product, Bargain Brand breakfast cereal. Our very low prices quickly drew many customers away from the top-selling cereal compan 59
- No field of study can advance significantly unless it incorporates knowledge and experience from outside that field.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the posit 66
- It is more harmful to compromise one's own beliefs than to adhere to them. 50
- The following is a letter to the editor of the Waymarsh Times.Traffic here in Waymarsh is becoming a problem. Although just three years ago a state traffic survey showed that the typical driving commuter took 20 minutes to get to work, the commute now tak 69
- The main benefit of the study of history is to dispel the illusion that people living now are significantly different from people who lived in earlier times.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement 54
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 333, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: Couldn't
...se our beliefs or stick to our beliefs? Couldnt we integrate our beliefs with others? ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, nonetheless, really, so, therefore, of course, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 70.0 33.0505617978 212% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 50.0 58.6224719101 85% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1786.0 2235.4752809 80% => OK
No of words: 396.0 442.535393258 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.5101010101 5.05705443957 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46091344257 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54099637651 2.79657885939 91% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 215.323595506 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.474747474747 0.4932671777 96% => OK
syllable_count: 562.5 704.065955056 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 6.24550561798 192% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.3782213098 60.3974514979 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 77.652173913 118.986275619 65% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2173913043 23.4991977007 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.47826086957 5.21951772744 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.283590554211 0.243740707755 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0759410357123 0.0831039109588 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100802718914 0.0758088955206 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.175759679922 0.150359130593 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0517090961245 0.0667264976115 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.4 14.1392134831 59% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 48.8420337079 146% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 12.1743820225 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.58 12.1639044944 71% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.07 8.38706741573 84% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 100.480337079 65% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 11.8971910112 46% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.