Some people think that when recruiting, companies should aim to take on people who are innovative and able to work independently while others considered they should recruit people who are able to work in a team and follow instructions. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Throughout the course of time, the world of business has been facing the classic dilemma over whether innovation and independence in prospective employees play a more essential role than teamwork and compliance. On the one hand, those who possess creative along with autonomous personalities will be more effective when faced with uphill tasks. Nonetheless, on the other hand, major operation projects require full cooperation among internal staff.
As for the role of creativity and self-reliance, there are advantages which business establishments can make use of. Assuming a company has a business trip, it would be better when a potential individual takes responsibility to go on that trip instead of a team because one assertive person will make decisions more efficiently. On top of that, having a representative employee with leadership and persuasive capabilities will result in fruitful negotiation and collaboration with other business partners. In order for a team- leader to successfully guide a group, not only should that person analyze the various implications arising from his decision and foresee different outcomes influenced by the unpredictable market, but he must also come up with novel ideas and strategies to convince others.
In terms of cooperative traits, they are indeed a principal element in commercial corporations. Having mutual effort from staff members in union, large-scale projects will run smoothly. Firstly, a team with different kinds of mindset along with fields of expertise is able to tackle issues relating to many technical areas. Moreover, in the case where the workers are aware of their appointed duties and make sure to fulfill them orderly and responsibly, the project will stay on track as expected. This form of operation also seems to be supportive for the employees themselves. Every time a member suffers a setback or underperforms due to personal reasons, other members can show sympathy and encouragement to help him get over that tough period.
In conclusion, the success of a business depends on lots of components. From personal observations, a recruiter should strike a balance between innovative lone-wolfs and cooperative team-players.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-01-27 | Fila | 73 | view |
| 2022-09-22 | jany01 | 67 | view |
| 2022-06-08 | gwyneth+12 | 78 | view |
| 2020-09-10 | stsoutsold | 73 | view |
| 2020-07-03 | moctutuyen | 84 | view |
- The graph below shows the changes in the percentage of households with cars in one European country between 1971 and 2001
- It seems that with the increase in the use of mobile phones and computers, fewer people prefer to write letters. Will the skill of writing disappear completely? 89
- The diagram below shows the process by which bricks are manufactured for the building industry.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The charts below give information on the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2050 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The pie charts below show the main reasons why students chose to study at a particular UK university in 1987 and 2007 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, moreover, nonetheless, so, as for, in conclusion, on the other hand, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1874.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 339.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.52802359882 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29091512845 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1587948456 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 221.0 176.041082164 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.65191740413 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 586.8 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.6806801445 49.4020404114 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.933333333 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.6 7.06120827912 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0977319727087 0.244688304435 40% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0291520122361 0.084324248473 35% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0306448670188 0.0667982634062 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0635354565025 0.151304729494 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0189199220498 0.056905535591 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.09 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.99 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 78.4519038076 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.