In general, people do not have such a close relationship with their neighbours as they did in the past.
Why is this so, and what can be done to improve contact between neighbours?
In the past, people had special relationship among their neighbour. Conversely, people less care with what happens with their neighbor this days. This issue happens because nowadays people are individualists and they isolate to the society.
Less communication between neighbors happens from several reasons. First, in modern lifestyle, we use a lot of technology for our mobility. These inventions are incredibly amazing because it helps us to contact with other people in different countries faster, but we do not realise that by doing this we enlarging our gap to the neighborhood. Second, people live in different place and far from their working area, these cause people go to work early and the go home late night. Consequently, people do not talk with their neighborhood so much.
There are some ways to make the contact between neighbors can be improved. First of all, each of district can make annual events for each category like children to adult. This event can be a competition like when independence day or a meeting to discuss any topics from politics, women empowerment, teenage issue, or health problem. This can help people to attend the event, learn new things and can contribute to any issue from their neighborhood. On the other hand, government can build some facilities for people to meet, for the example playground, gym, swimming pool, park or educational area for children and teens. By doing this, people can go out and do a lot of activities outside their home and make them communicate each other.
In conclusion, this suggestion will not neighbor as important as the past, but it can help them to get connected each other and build awareness to the current update of their neighbor problem.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-29 | Hem | 67 | view |
| 2019-11-11 | cindycornelia98 | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-11 | cindycornelia98 | 67 | view |
- The graph below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- The chart below gives information about the number of social networking sites people used in Canada in 2014 and 2015.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- The graph below shows average carbon dioxide CO2 emissions per person in the United Kingdom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The chart below shows the places visited by different people living in Canada Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 82
- The bar chart shows the scores of teams A,B and C over four different seasons. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 136, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...e with what happens with their neighbor this days. This issue happens because nowada...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, conversely, first, if, second, so, in conclusion, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1454.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 285.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10175438596 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74901924367 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.561403508772 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 433.8 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.3693385283 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.9333333333 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.66666666667 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.304370484902 0.244688304435 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112354326717 0.084324248473 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0745600516245 0.0667982634062 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18429528757 0.151304729494 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0766249815898 0.056905535591 135% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.9 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 78.4519038076 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.