The charts show students' satisfaction on three kinds of facilities.
The pie charts illustrate three different attitudes of students toward three types of facilities.
In terms of social facilities, the satisfactions of undergraduates and postgraduates differ from each other. There are 85% of undergraduates very satisfied with social facilities, which is nearly three times than that of postgraduates. However, the choice of quite satisfied is chosen by 45% of postgraduates, the figure in undergraduates is only 1%.
Compared to social facilities, the difference of cafeteria’s satisfactions is subtle between undergraduates and postgraduates. Postgraduates occupy 74% in the choice of very satisfied, while 52% of undergraduates choose it. As for the option of not satisfied, the number of undergraduates is three times as many as postgraduates.
Undergraduates and postgraduates are similar with each other in the aspect of bedroom’s facilities. Students who are very satisfied with the facilities take up 63% and 62% respectively. Meanwhile, only about 15% of undergraduates and postgraduates have no satisfaction with the facilities in bedroom.
Overall, the most satisfactory facilities for undergraduates is social facilities, while for postgraduates is cafeteria.
- The chart shows the different ways of dealing with the garbage in four countries 67
- The chart below shows the percentage of the whole world population in four countries from 1950-2002,withprojectionsto2050. 67
- Some people believe that spending money on developing technology for space exploration is unjustifiable there are more beneficial ways to spend money To what extent do you agree or disagree 71
- Thechart showsthedifferentwaysofdealingwiththegarbageinfourcountries 11
- In many countries prison is the common solution to the problem of crime However another effective way is to provide people with better education so that they will not become criminals To what extent do you agree or disagree 62
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, while, as for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1064.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 174.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.11494252874 4.92477711251 124% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.9904472071 2.65546596893 150% => OK
Unique words: 88.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.505747126437 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 322.2 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.45097560976 131% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 13.055507688 43.030603864 30% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 96.7272727273 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.8181818182 22.9334400587 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.72727272727 5.23603664747 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193923396567 0.215688989381 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0888505310396 0.103423049105 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0873490627958 0.0843802449381 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137278053556 0.15604864568 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.100736154555 0.0819641961636 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.87 61.2550243902 50% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.51609756098 200% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.3012195122 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.86 11.4140731707 156% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.65 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.