Industrial pollution is increasing all around the world. Some people say that the most effective way to tackle the problem is to Tax companies that are causing the pollution. Others argue that, there are other ways to control the situation.
Discuss both views and give your own opinio
This is a topic which provokes great debate amongst people and enterprises due to its importance and impact on the environment. Whilst some argue that high taxation to companies could mitigate the issue, there is a different school of thought which believes that to address industrial pollution, other measures need to take into account. However, in my opinion, I agree with the idea that high tax could be an effective solution.
To begin with, industrial wastes are one of the major contributors to pollution. Unpurified wastewater, toxic gas, noise and light contaminating environment all day long. Ordinary people are almost unable to go against this as most of the industries are owned by powerful individuals, who are backed by the government most of the times. For instance, despite workers boycotts and protests many companies keep running their factories in developing countries. In fact, these factories provide employment to locals, consequently, minimizing the government's intervention. Therefore, to control this, policymakers should introduce hefty taxation when starting factories and further, they should make filtration mechanisms mandatory before granting approvals for establishment.
On the other hand, to handle such monopolised, and highly economically-impactful issues, there is very less common people could do. Moreover, even police and local authorities are controlled by these powerful enterprises. Bribery and corrupted systems in most developing nations would not allow people to voice-up. If people take actions against them there is a certain risk of them losing jobs. As a matter of fact, corrupted politicians preventing people's actions against such industries. Therefore, without the government's support tackling this issue would be inconceivable.
In conclusion, in my opinion, it would be impossible to handle this issue without heavy tax and policies because other actions which people could take are extremely limited.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-28 | sivasankar | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-16 | Adilrahi | 73 | view |
- In some countries, most people prefer to rent a house rather than buying one. Describe the advantages and disadvantages of renting. 78
- You recently went on a business trip and stayed in a hotel On getting home you realised you left some things at the hotel Write a letter to the manager stating Details of your stay The items you left behind What you want the manager to do 87
- In today's world of advanced science and technology, we still greatly value our artists such as musicians, painters and writers. What can the arts tell us about life that science and technology cannot? 84
- Some people prefer to raise children in the cities while others believe that children should be raised in the countryside Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- During a recent plane journey, you sat next to a businessman who owns a chain of restaurants. You talked to him and he suggested that you should contact him about a possible job in one of his restaurants. Write a letter to this businessman. In your letter 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 543, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'governments'' or 'government's'?
Suggestion: governments'; government's
...to locals, consequently, minimizing the governments intervention. Therefore, to control thi...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 316, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ons would not allow people to voice-up. If people take actions against them there ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, as a matter of fact, in my opinion, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1680.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 292.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.75342465753 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13304322383 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.633561643836 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 515.7 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.200229561 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.0 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.25 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1875 7.06120827912 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.173414149382 0.244688304435 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0493546013866 0.084324248473 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0362765003981 0.0667982634062 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101358216367 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.021765288376 0.056905535591 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.07 12.4159519038 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.45 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.