SOME PEOPLE CLAIM THAT NOT ENOUGH OF THE WASTE FROM HOMES IS RECYCLED. THEY SAY THAT THE ONLY WAY TO INCREASE RECYCLING IS FOR GOVERNMENTS TO MAKE IT A LEGAL REQUIREMENT. TO WHAT EXTEND DO YOU THINK LAWS ARE NEEDED TO MAKE PEOPLE RECYCLE MORE OF THEIR WASTE?
Many people believe that the garbage produced from houses is not recycled properly. They affirm that the authorities should create new laws in order to obligate people to improve recycling. The question is, why the waste is not enough recycled? In my opinion the waste is not enough recycled, because some people do not know how to do it, and they do not have a place to share old goods. This essay will disagree with this statement.
Although, the laws help the population to follow a rule about recycling, it will not solve the problem. If a person comes from high society and has money to pay for some punishment established by this new law, this person will prefer paying the tax instead of to recycle. For instance, I know a neighbourhood near my area that has a group of people that make new things with residue from homes. They make bags with package of milk and some pieces of art to decorate houses with metal from cans. Furthermore, they do not receive any funding from the government to incentive it, but they are saving much money doing this work.
Additionally, some people like to change the furniture in their houses very often and, it will become a waste. But if they had a place to exchange their goods, it would not be a trash. One clear example that happened to me last month. When I bought a new sofa the old one was great, and I would give to someone who wanted it. However, I live in a poor area and this furniture could be used in another house, I did not know anyone to give my old sofa. So if we have a place where we can give or receive things, it will not happen frequently.
In conclusion, even though the new laws could aid people to recycle their garbage, it will not a solution for this problem. While some people, do not know how to do it and they do not have a space to exchange old things, the recycle will not increase. Neither with new laws.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-05-22 | ndbro17 | 73 | view |
| 2021-05-22 | ndbro17 | 73 | view |
| 2020-12-27 | Hanachan123456789 | 78 | view |
| 2020-04-17 | Shraddanand | 73 | view |
| 2020-02-24 | saipriyanka | 73 | view |
- There will be a traditional celebration in your country and you want to invite your friendfrom an English-speaking country. Write him/her a letter and- invite your friend,- explain what happens at the party,- describe the tradition and why it’s importan 73
- In many countries a small number of people earn extremely high salaries Some people believe that this is good for the country but others think that governments should not allow salaries above a certain level Discuss both views and give your opinion 87
- Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology.Discuss both these views a 78
- SOME PEOPLE CLAIM THAT NOT ENOUGH OF THE WASTE FROM HOMES IS RECYCLED. THEY SAY THAT THE ONLY WAY TO INCREASE RECYCLING IS FOR GOVERNMENTS TO MAKE IT A LEGAL REQUIREMENT. TO WHAT EXTEND DO YOU THINK LAWS ARE NEEDED TO MAKE PEOPLE RECYCLE MORE OF THEIR WAS 56
- Some people think that personal happiness is directly related to economic success. Others argue that happiness depends more on other factors. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, so, while, for instance, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 42.0 24.0651302605 175% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1546.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 350.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.41714285714 5.12529762239 86% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32530772707 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.32277982651 2.80592935109 83% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.505714285714 0.561755894193 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 486.0 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 5.43587174349 239% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.9166471175 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.3684210526 106.682146367 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4210526316 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.42105263158 7.06120827912 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.276439355147 0.244688304435 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0838270045256 0.084324248473 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0676306174563 0.0667982634062 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18435840015 0.151304729494 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0788368021178 0.056905535591 139% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.6 13.0946893788 66% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 50.2224549098 140% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 11.3001002004 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.36 12.4159519038 67% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.83 8.58950901804 80% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 78.4519038076 65% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 10.7795591182 65% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.