TPO 55
In this set of materials, both the reading passage and the lecturer discuss using of a boxed-shape device in order to condense the water vapor in the atmospher, and help trees to grow for the preventing of desertification process. The reading passage firmly states that this device is impractical and proivides three reasons for it. However, the professor casts doubt on all of the reasons, citing that these reasons are not convincing.
Firstly, the article contends that these devices are highly expensive, and in order to prevent the desertification, millions of should be planted; thus, some contries cannot afford to purchase them. On the other hand, the professor articulates that, once the a young tree grows and become big enough, the device can be removed and utlilize it for another tree. Therefore, by reusing of these devices the cost is become much reasonable.
In addition, the essay alleges that the local people in deserts work in harsh atmosphere, and due to these trees are not working as a food source for them, it is hard to nudge them into taking care of these trees. Nevertheless, the lecturer avers that although these trees do not provide for the local people, these devices can use for other plants such as vegetables which beneficiary for them. Besides, when the trees become large, the local people can cut their branches and sell them as firewood.
Eventually, the text asserts that, when the trees outgrow, these devices cannot provide enough water for them in the harsh desert conditions. On the contrary, the professor declares that when these trees grows in that harsh condition their roots become long enough to reach the underground water. Thus, they can survive in the harsh climate of the deserts. She states that a researches have been conducted in Sahara desert reveals that 90% of trees have been survived after ten days which these devices have been removed.
- TPO 51 3
- The following is a recommendation from the personnel director to the president of Acme Publishing Company Many other companies have recently stated that having their employees take the Easy Read Speed Reading Course has greatly improved productivity One g 58
- TPO 24 68
- TPO-20 - Independent Writing TaskDo you agree or disagree with the following statement?Successful people try new things and take risks rather than only doing what they know how to do well.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
- tpo 28 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 372, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
.... However, the professor casts doubt on all of the reasons, citing that these reasons are ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 256, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'a' is left.
Suggestion: the; a
...d, the professor articulates that, once the a young tree grows and become big enough,...
^^^^^
Line 13, column 374, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a research' or simply 'researches'?
Suggestion: a research; researches
...climate of the deserts. She states that a researches have been conducted in Sahara desert re...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, firstly, however, if, nevertheless, so, therefore, thus, in addition, such as, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 12.0772626932 132% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 22.412803532 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 30.3222958057 109% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1600.0 1373.03311258 117% => OK
No of words: 317.0 270.72406181 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04731861199 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53548098669 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 145.348785872 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.523659305994 0.540411800872 97% => OK
syllable_count: 484.2 419.366225166 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0662251656 99% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 21.2450331126 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.5048110581 49.2860985944 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.076923077 110.228320801 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3846153846 21.698381199 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.92307692308 7.06452816374 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.3589403974 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 53.8541721854 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.0289183223 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 12.2367328918 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.42419426049 103% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 63.6247240618 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.498013245 110% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.