In many developing countries, there is a problem with declining quality of air and water from both industry and construction. What measures could be taken to prevent this?
Industry and construction businesses are booming around the globe, especially in various growing nations. Industries dump their garbage to rivers, lakes and seas, while construction companies release harmful smoke in the air. Hence, water gets contaminated; air gets polluted rapidly. However, if government takes some initiatives such as setting rules regulations and imposing restoration costs, then it is feasible to maintain good quality of air and water.
First of all, one of the major solutions can be making rules and regulations to save the environment such as water and air. The appropriate authorities usually prevent the plants and corporations to dump rubbish into rivers, charging extra money to contaminate the water. Moreover, many industries such as brick making plants pollute the air when these industries release tremendous smoke into the air. Therefore, if government limits the amount of smoke releasing in the air, then air pollution will diminish. Besides, some prevention rules about throwing damaged cargo in the sea also stop ships and boats to contaminate water. For instance, Garments companies in Bangladesh are not allowed to dump more than 2000 tones of garbage per year in the water. This is how setting up rules and regulations improves air and water qualities.
Secondly, charging restoration costs can prevent companies to damage water and air. Government often charges additional money to companies for improving water and air conditions, resulting corporations stop throwing rubbish in the environment. Besides, companies, which release huge amount of smoke in the air are responsible to pay more penalty fees for reducing the harmful effects on people. In addition to this, these companies pay high tax to government so that air or water related ailments can be treated. For instance, brick making companies pay 38.5% tax on earnings every year for polluting the residential areas. Therefore, charging restoration cost can not only prevent companies to dump rubbish but also improves water and air qualities.
In conclusion, many developing nations are facing difficulties to maintain good quality of air and water because of growing number of construction businesses and industries. But, governments of developing countries can maintain the quality of water and air, setting up regulations and charging restoration costs.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-06 | Raji Hasan | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-06 | Raji Hasan | 67 | view |
| 2019-09-04 | Shazia | 73 | view |
| 2019-08-05 | eppa akhil | 61 | view |
| 2018-12-18 | joennika214 | 61 | view |
- Some people believe that violence on television and in computer games has a damaging effect on the society. Others deny that these factors have any significant influence on people's behavior. What is your opinion? 61
- The growing number of overweight people is putting a strain on the health care system in an effort to deal with the health issues involved. Some people think that the best way to deal with this problem is to introduce more physical education lessons in th 73
- Some people prefer to work on school projects with a group while others would rather work alone Discuss both sides and give your opinion 73
- Eventually technology will solve the most important environmental problems the world faces today To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Friendships can be very meaningful and special but also very complicated What are the qualities of a great friend What are some things that can weaken a close relationship over time 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, hence, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, while, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 10.4138276553 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 7.0 24.0651302605 29% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2015.0 1615.20841683 125% => OK
No of words: 362.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.56629834254 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36191444098 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.901895243 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.483425414365 0.561755894193 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 616.5 506.74238477 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.6155420752 49.4020404114 60% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 106.052631579 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0526315789 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.73684210526 7.06120827912 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.219613679349 0.244688304435 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0823882381253 0.084324248473 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0423901561592 0.0667982634062 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156045031742 0.151304729494 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0313930074208 0.056905535591 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.