Many people argue that living in horizontal city is the best, while others believe that living in vertical buildings is better. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Many people argue that living in the city with horizontal building is the best, while opponents of this idea prefer to live in cities with high-rise constructions. I accept that there are advantages for residents who dwell in low-rise buildings, it seems to me that it is better to live in cities developing vertically.
There are different reasons why people choose to settle in horizontal areas. The first reason is based on financial management. Since the person lives in private house, hi or she does not have to pay for building service which can cost them a great amount of money. Thanks to that, the individual would be able to save up money or spend on other purposes. Secondly, that decisions might be made due to security reasons. For example, when an emergency occur such as a massive fire takes place inhabitants living lower to the ground could find it easier to escape than those who live up to the high sky.
Despite all the benefits of setting in horizontal city above, it is not to say that living in modern building has no redeeming features. In fact, I believe it is more advantageous for individuals choosing to live in high-rise buildings. First of all, it not only accommodates an increasing population but also requires less land resources. Secondly, since less land is used for residential areas, it creates more space for public usage. The government can use this land to build hospitals, schools, entertainment, hence facilitate public services and accommodation. Furthermore, it also symbolizes the modernity and development of a city. For instance, big corporations often settle on top of the building, if the city constructs a plethora of skyscrapers, chances are many multiple-national company are operating in one areas.
In conclusion, it is evident that both living in vertical and horizontal areas are advantageous in their own ways, it seems to me that it is better to live in cities with modern buildings.
- Some people could be naturally good leaders. Others believe that people can learn leadership skills. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 89
- Many people think that countries should import less food and produce more for their population. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
- The range of technology available to people is increasing the gap between the rich and the poor. Others think it has an opposite effect. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 89
- Many people argue that living in horizontal city is the best, while others believe that living in vertical buildings is better. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 84
- Many young people now know more about international movie and pop stars than famous people in the history of their own country.What are the reasons? What can be done to make young people interested famous people in the history of their own country. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 818, Rule ID: ONE_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use the numeral 'one' with plural words. Did you mean 'one area', 'an area', or simply 'areas'?
Suggestion: one area; an area; areas
...tiple-national company are operating in one areas. In conclusion, it is evident that...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, hence, if, second, secondly, so, well, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1635.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 325.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03076923077 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24591054749 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96576760971 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584615384615 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 522.0 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.2594887425 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.1875 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3125 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.3125 7.06120827912 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.314499957146 0.244688304435 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0882056765972 0.084324248473 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10390115743 0.0667982634062 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.215448141053 0.151304729494 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0967577228831 0.056905535591 170% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.